Ramanujan's theta functions and linear combinations of three triangular numbers
Zhi-Hong Sun

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationships between Ramanujan's theta functions and the counts of representations of integers as sums of quadratic and triangular forms, providing new formulas and conjectures for specific parameter cases.
Contribution
It establishes explicit relations between representations by quadratic and triangular forms using Ramanujan's theta functions and derives formulas for various parameter configurations.
Findings
Relations between $t(2,3,3;n)$ and $N(1,3,3;n+1)$
Formulas for $t(a,3a,4b;n)$, $t(a,7a,4b;n)$, $t(3a,5a,4b;n)$, and $t(a,15a,4b;n)$ under certain conditions
Numerous conjectures on $t(a,b,c;n)$ for special $(a,b,c)$ values
Abstract
Let be the set of integers. For positive integers and let be the number of representations of by , and let be the number of representations of by . In this paper, by using Ramanujan's theta functions and we reveal the relation between and , and the relation between and . We also obtain formulas for and under certain congruence conditions, where and are positive odd integers. In addition, we pose many conjectures on for some special values of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Mathematical Identities Β· Analytic Number Theory Research Β· Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Ramanujanβs theta functions and linear combinations of three triangular numbers
[TABLE]
Zhi-Hong Sun
School of Mathematical Sciences
Huaiyin Normal University
Huaian, Jiangsu 223300, P.R. China
Email: [email protected]
Homepage: http://www.hytc.edu.cn/xsjl/szh
Abstract
Let be the set of integers. For positive integers and let be the number of representations of by , and let be the number of representations of by . In this paper, by using Ramanujanβs theta functions and we reveal the relation between and , and the relation between and . We also obtain formulas for and under certain congruence conditions, where and are positive odd integers. In addition, we pose many conjectures on for some special values of .
Keywords: theta function; triangular number; ternary form
Mathematics Subject Classification 2010: 11D85, 11E25, 30B10, 33E20
1. Introduction
Let , and be the set of integers, the set of positive integers and the set of nonnegative integers, respectively, and let and . For and set
[TABLE]
Since we see that
[TABLE]
For let
[TABLE]
where denotes the number of elements in which are equal to . In 2005 Adiga, Cooper and Han [ACH] showed that
[TABLE]
In 2008 Baruah, Cooper and Hirschhorn [BCH] proved that
[TABLE]
Ramanujanβs theta functions and are defined by
[TABLE]
It is evident that for positive integers and ,
[TABLE]
There are many identities involving and . From [BCH, Lemma 4.1] or [Be] we know that for ,
[TABLE]
By [S1, Lemma 2.4],
[TABLE]
By [S1, Lemma 2.3], for we have
[TABLE]
Using theta function identities we may establish some relations between and for some certain values of . See [S2,S3].
In this paper we reveal the relation between and , and the relation between and . We also obtain formulas for and under certain congruence conditions, where and are positive odd integers. In addition, we pose many conjectures on for some special values of .
2. The relation between and
By (1.4), for we have
[TABLE]
By [S2, Theorem 6.1], if , , and , then
[TABLE]
Now we present the following formula for .
*Theorem 2.1. *** For we have
[TABLE]
For with we have
[TABLE]
Proof. By (1.6) and (1.9),
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
and so
[TABLE]
This yields . By (1.12),
[TABLE]
Thus, using (1.9), (1.10) and the above we see that
[TABLE]
This yields
[TABLE]
and so
[TABLE]
Also, from (2.2) we deduce that
[TABLE]
and so
[TABLE]
On the other hand,
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
and so
[TABLE]
Combining (2.3),(2.4), (2.7) and (2.8) yields
[TABLE]
Hence for .
Now we consider the case . By (2.10),
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
and so
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
Combining (2.5),(2.6),(2.12) and (2.13) yields
[TABLE]
That is,
[TABLE]
By (2.11),
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
From (2.2) we see that
[TABLE]
and so
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
and so
[TABLE]
Combining (2.17)-(2.18) with (2.14) and (2.15) yields
[TABLE]
That is,
[TABLE]
From (2.16) we see that
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
Thus, From (2.19) we see that
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
This together with (2.20) and (2.21) gives
[TABLE]
This completes the proof.
3. The relation between and
By (1.4), for we have
[TABLE]
*Theorem 3.1. *** For we have
[TABLE]
For with we have
[TABLE]
Proof. By (1.7)-(1.11),
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
This yields
[TABLE]
Since , from (3.1) we see that
[TABLE]
This yields
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
By (1.7) and (3.6), . By (3.4),
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
Replacing with yields
[TABLE]
By (3.7),
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
From (3.11) and (1.7) we find that . By (1.6) and (1.10),
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
and so . On the other hand,
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
Substituting with yields
[TABLE]
Combining (3.2) with (3.14) gives , and combining (3.3) with (3.15) yields . By (3.13),
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Combining (3.5) with (3.16) gives , and combining (3.6) with (3.17) yields . By (3.12),
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
Combining (3.8) with (3.19) yields , and combining (3.9) with (3.20) gives .
By (1.8)-(1.11),
[TABLE]
Now from (3.18) and the above we deduce that
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
Replacing with yields
[TABLE]
Combining (3.10) and (3.21) gives , and combining (3.11) with (3.22) yields .
Summarizing the above proves the theorem.
4. Formulas for
and
*Lemma 4.1. *** Let with . For we have
[TABLE]
Proof. By (1.9) and (1.11),
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
Substituting with and then applying (1.7) yields the result.
*Lemma 4.2. *** Let with . If , then
[TABLE]
If , then
[TABLE]
Proof. By (1.13),
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
Substituting with in the last two formulas yields the result in the case . Now suppose . Substituting with in the first formula gives
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
Replacing with yields
[TABLE]
By (1.11), . Thus the result in the case follows from the above. The proof is now complete.
*Theorem 4.1. *** For we have
[TABLE]
Proof. By Lemma 4.1 and (1.8),
[TABLE]
Thus, . By Lemma 4.2,
[TABLE]
Thus, . By Lemma 4.1,
[TABLE]
Thus, . On the other hand, using Lemma 4.2 we see that
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
Therefore, .
By Lemma 4.1, . By (1.11),
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
and so
[TABLE]
On the other hand, using Lemma 4.2 we see that
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
and so
[TABLE]
which yields . By Lemma 4.1 and (1.11),
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
On the other hand, from Lemma 4.2 we know that
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
and so .
By the above, the formulas for and are true. Using Lemmas 4.1-4.2 and similar arguments we may deduce the remaining results for and .
5. Formulas for
and
We begin with an identity involving .
*Lemma 5.1. *** For we have
[TABLE]
Proof. By [Be, p.315],
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
Combining (5.1) with (5.2) gives the result.
*Lemma 5.2. *** Suppose with . Then
[TABLE]
Proof. Note that Using Lemma 5.1 we see that
[TABLE]
Replacing with yields the result.
*Theorem 5.1. *** For we have
[TABLE]
Proof. We only prove the formula for . The other formulas can be proved similarly. By (1.9),
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
Replacing with gives
[TABLE]
By Lemma 5.2,
[TABLE]
Thus . This completes the proof.
6. Formulas for and
In order to deduce formulas for and , we begin with two useful identities.
*Lemma 6.1. *** For we have
[TABLE]
We note that (6.1) can be found in [Be,p.377], and (6.2) was deduced by Xia and Zhang in [XZ].
*Lemma 6.2. *** For we have
[TABLE]
Proof. By (6.2),
[TABLE]
This together with (6.1) yields the first identity. By (6.1),
[TABLE]
Combining this with (6.2) gives the second identity.
*Lemma 6.3. *** Let . Then for , and
[TABLE]
Proof. Note that . In view of Lemma 6.2 we see that
[TABLE]
Replacing with yields (6.3). Similarly,
[TABLE]
and so
[TABLE]
which yields . So the lemma is proved.
*Lemma 6.4. *** Suppose with . Then
[TABLE]
Proof. By (1.9),
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
Now replacing with yields the result.
*Theorem 6.1. *** For we have
[TABLE]
Proof. By Lemma 6.4,
[TABLE]
This together with Lemma 6.3 (with ) yields
[TABLE]
By Lemma 6.3,
[TABLE]
By Lemma 6.4 and the above,
[TABLE]
Hence . The remaining results for and can be proved similarly.
*Theorem 6.2. *** For we have
[TABLE]
Proof. Suppose with . Then
[TABLE]
Applying Lemma 6.2 we see that
[TABLE]
Substituting with yields
[TABLE]
On the other hand,
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
Replacing with yields
[TABLE]
Taking in (6.5) and (6.7) gives
[TABLE]
which implies . Taking and in (6.6) yields
[TABLE]
Taking and in (6.7) yields
[TABLE]
Thus, . The remaining parts for and can be proved similarly.
7. Some conjectures on
Let . Based on calculations on Maple, in this section we pose many conjectures on .
*Conjecture 7.1. *** Let with . Then
[TABLE]
*Conjecture 7.2. *** Let with . Then
[TABLE]
*Conjecture 7.3. *** Let with . Then
[TABLE]
*Conjecture 7.4. *** Let and
[TABLE]
* If , then .*
* If , then*
[TABLE]
* If , then*
[TABLE]
*Conjecture 7.5. *** Let with . Then
[TABLE]
*Conjecture 7.6. *** Let with . Then
[TABLE]
*Conjecture 7.7. *** Let with . Then
[TABLE]
*Conjecture 7.8. *** Let with . Then
[TABLE]
*Conjecture 7.9. *** Let with . Then
[TABLE]
*Conjecture 7.10. *** Let with . Then
[TABLE]
*Conjecture 7.11. *** Let with . Then
[TABLE]
*Conjecture 7.12. *** Let with . Then
[TABLE]
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[ACH] C. Adiga, S. Cooper and J. H. Han, A general relation between sums of squares and sums of triangular numbers , Int. J. Number Theory 1 (2005), 175-182.
- 2[BCH] N. D. Baruah, S. Cooper and M. Hirschhorn, Sums of squares and sums of triangular numbers induced by partitions of 8 8 8 , Int. J. Number Theory 4 (2008), 525-538.
- 3[Be] B.C. Berndt, Ramanujanβs Notebooks , Part III, Springer, New York, 1991.
- 4[S 1] Z.H. Sun, Some relations between t β ( a , b , c , d ; n ) π‘ π π π π π t(a,b,c,d;n) and N β ( a , b , c , d ; n ) π π π π π π N(a,b,c,d;n) , Acta Arith. 175 (2016), 269-289.
- 5[S 2] Z.H. Sun, Ramanujanβs theta functions and sums of triangular numbers , Int. J. Number Theory, accepted.
- 6[S 3] Z.H. Sun, On the number of representations of n π n as a linear combination of triangular numbers , Int. J. Number Theory, accepted.
- 7[XZ] E.X.W. Xia and Y. Zhang, Proofs of some conjectures of Sun on the relations between sums of squares and sums of triangular numbers , Int. J. Number Theory, accepted.
