Strong absorption of hadrons with hidden and open strangeness in nuclear matter
J. Adamczewski-Musch, O. Arnold, E. T. Atomssa, C. Behnke, A., Belounnas, A. Belyaev, J. C. Berger-Chen, J. Biernat, A. Blanco, C. Blume, M., B\"ohmer, S. Chernenko, L. Chlad, P. Chudoba, I. Ciepal, C. Deveaux, D., Dittert, J. Dreyer, A. Dybczak, E. Epple, L. Fabbietti

TL;DR
This study reports the first experimental observation of K- and absorption in nuclear matter, revealing significant in-medium effects and strong coupling between mesons and K- in nuclear environments.
Contribution
It provides the first experimental evidence of and K- absorption in nuclear matter and demonstrates the strong coupling between mesons and K- in the nuclear medium.
Findings
Larger K- absorption in heavier nuclei.
Similar /K- ratios in different reactions.
Indication of strong N in-medium coupling.
Abstract
We present the first observation of K- and \phi absorption within nuclear matter by means of \pi- -induced reactions on C and W targets at an incident beam momentum of 1.7 GeV/c studied with HADES at SIS18/GSI. The double ratio (K-/K+)W / (K-/K+)C is found to be 0.319 \pm 0.009(stat)+0.014-0.012 (syst) indicating a larger absorption of K- in heavier targets as compared to lighter ones. The measured \phi/K- ratios in \pi-+C and \pi^- +W reactions within the HADES acceptance are found to be equal to (syst) and to (syst), respectively. The similar ratios measured in the two different reactions demonstrate for the first time experimentally that the dynamics of the \phi meson in nuclear medium is strongly coupled to the K- dynamics. The large difference in the \phi production off C and W nuclei is discussed in terms of a strong…
| Target | Particle | [] |
|---|---|---|
| C | ||
| C | ||
| C | ||
| W | ||
| W | ||
| W |
| Ratios | |
|---|---|
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Strong absorption of hadrons with hidden and open strangeness in nuclear matter
J. Adamczewski-Musch4, O. Arnold10,9, E.T. Atomssa16, C. Behnke8, A. Belounnas16, A. Belyaev7, J.C. Berger-Chen10,9, J. Biernat3, A. Blanco1, C. Blume8, M. Böhmer10, S. Chernenko7,†, L. Chlad17, P. Chudoba17, I. Ciepał2, C. Deveaux11, D. Dittert5, J. Dreyer6, A. Dybczak3, E. Epple10,9, L. Fabbietti10,9, O. Fateev7, P. Fonte1,a, C. Franco1, J. Friese10, I. Fröhlich8, T. Galatyuk5,4, J. A. Garzón18, R. Gernhäuser10, M. Golubeva12, R. Greifenhagen6,c, F. Guber12, M. Gumberidze4,b, S. Harabasz5,3, T. Heinz4, T. Hennino16, C. Höhne11,4, R. Holzmann4, A. Ierusalimov7, A. Ivashkin12, B. Kämpfer6,c, B. Kardan8, I. Koenig4, W. Koenig4, B. W. Kolb4, G. Korcyl3, G. Kornakov5, F. Kornas5, R. Kotte6, J. Kuboś2, A. Kugler17, T. Kunz10, A. Kurepin12, A. Kurilkin7, P. Kurilkin7, V. Ladygin7, R. Lalik3, K. Lapidus10,9, A. Lebedev13, S. Linev4, L. Lopes1, M. Lorenz8, T. Mahmoud11, L. Maier10, A. Malige3, J. Markert4, S. Maurus10, V. Metag11, J. Michel8, D.M. Mihaylov10,9, V. Mikhaylov17, S. Morozov12,14, C. Müntz8, R. Münzer10,9, L. Naumann6, K. Nowakowski3, Y. Parpottas15,d, V. Pechenov4, O. Pechenova4, O. Petukhov12, J. Pietraszko4, A.P. Prozorov17, W. Przygoda3, B. Ramstein16, A. Reshetin12, P. Rodriguez-Ramos17, A. Rost5, A. Sadovsky12, P. Salabura3, T. Scheib8, K. Schmidt-Sommerfeld10, H. Schuldes8, E. Schwab4, F. Scozzi5,16, F. Seck5, P. Sellheim8, J. Siebenson10, L. Silva1, J. Smyrski3, S. Spataroe, S. Spies8, H. Ströbele8, J. Stroth8,4, P. Strzempek3, C. Sturm4, O. Svoboda17, M. Szala8, P. Tlusty17, M. Traxler4, H. Tsertos15, C. Ungethüm5 O. Vázquez Doce9,8, V. Wagner17, C. Wendisch4, M.G. Wiebusch8, J. Wirth10,9, Y. Zanevsky7,†, P. Zumbruch4
(HADES collaboration)
C. Curceanuf, K. Piscicchiag,f, A. Scordof
1LIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas , 3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal
2Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31342 Kraków, Poland
3Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University of Cracow, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
4GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
5Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
6Institut für Strahlenphysik, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01314 Dresden, Germany
7Joint Institute of Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
8Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
9Excellence Cluster ’Origin and Structure of the Universe’ , 85748 Garching, Germany
10Physik Department E62, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
11II.Physikalisches Institut, Justus Liebig Universität Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany
12Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Science, 117312 Moscow, Russia
13Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 117218 Moscow, Russia
14National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409 Moscow, Russia
15Department of Physics, University of Cyprus, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus
16Institut de Physique Nucléaire, CNRS-IN2P3, Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91406 Orsay Cedex, France
17Nuclear Physics Institute, The Czech Academy of Sciences, 25068 Rez, Czech Republic
18LabCAF. F. Física, Univ. de Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
a also at Coimbra Polytechnic - ISEC, Coimbra, Portugal
b also at ExtreMe Matter Institute EMMI, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
c also at Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
d also at Frederick University, 1036 Nicosia, Cyprus
e also at Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN, Università di Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy
fINFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, 00044 Frascati, Italy
gCENTRO FERMI - Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche “Enrico Fermi”, 00184 Rome, Italy
† Deceased.
Abstract
We present the first observation of and absorption within nuclear matter by means of -induced reactions on C and W targets at an incident beam momentum of studied with HADES at SIS18/GSI. The double ratio is found to be indicating a larger absorption of in heavier targets as compared to lighter ones. The measured ratios in and reactions within the HADES acceptance are found to be equal to and to , respectively. The similar ratios measured in the two different reactions demonstrate for the first time experimentally that the dynamics of the meson in nuclear medium is strongly coupled to the dynamics. The large difference in the production off C and W nuclei is discussed in terms of a strong in-medium coupling.
pacs:
25.80.Hp, 21.65-f, 13.75.Jz, 13.75.Gx
Hadron-hadron interactions are studied to understand in detail low energy QCD. The energy scale that drives these interactions is of the order of GeV and hence characterized by the non-perturbative regime, in which effective field theories Kaiser et al. (1995); Oset and Ramos (1998) can be applied. A quantitative understanding of the (anti-)kaon-nucleon interaction is necessary to constrain and develop these theories.
Kaon-nucleon scattering data Patrignani et al. (2016) allowed to determine the scattering parameters of the interaction that is found to be repulsive. Comparable (model-dependent) results were obtained by studying the behaviour of kaons within nuclear matter at various baryonic densities by means of (fixed target) and reactions at kinetic energies of few GeV. Analyses of the distribution of kaon (transverse) momenta, anisotropies in the azimuthal distribution in the plane transverse to the beam direction (anisotropic flow) and cross-sections led as well to the conclusion that the real part of and potential is repulsive within MeV at saturation densities and small kaon momenta Hartnack et al. (2012); Agakishiev et al. (2014a); Zinyuk et al. (2014); Metag et al. (2017).
The antikaon in-medium properties are more entangled Agakishiev et al. (2009a); Gasik et al. (2016); Adamczewski-Musch et al. (2018a). The interpretation of scattering experiments and kaonic atoms Friedman and Gal (2007); Bazzi et al. (2011a, 2009, b) is consistent with the existence of the resonance just below the threshold Oller and Meissner (2001); Ikeda et al. (2012). This translates on the one hand to an attractive interaction for this system and on the other hand to a large coupling of the channel to baryonic resonances and hence to a large imaginary part of the potential Fuchs (2006); Cabrera et al. (2014). To the present, absorption processes for were studied for slow Vázquez Doce et al. (2016); Piscicchia et al. (2016, 2018); Agnello et al. (2015) and hence should be extended to higher energies.
The properties of meson are determined by its almost pure content. Its narrow width () is dominated by the OZI allowed decay Okubo (1977). Hence, the modification of spectral function are expected to have a significant impact on in-medium properties Cabrera et al. (2017a). The behaviour of the within a nuclear environment is debated since decades in a very controversial way. Indeed, in the interpretation of the ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions data Abelev et al. (2015); Wada (2013) the cross-sections are assumed to be small Steinheimer and Bleicher (2016) due to OZI suppression. On the contrary, measurements of the modification of the production rate in proton- and photon-induced reactions off different nuclear targets do suggest a rather sizable interaction cross-section Hartmann et al. (2012); Ishikawa et al. (2005); Muto et al. (2007). These data are, however, interpreted in a rather model-dependent way Mühlich and Mosel (2006); Cabrera et al. (2017b) implying the contribution of secondary processes, in-medium propagation, initial and final state interactions that have to be taken into account to extract final conclusions.
In this context, investigations of the and production close to production threshold in pion-induced reactions offer an ideal environment. Firstly, the production of the mesons is strongly correlated by means of two channels: (a) direct () and (b) resonant () production, as known from elementary reactions Maeda et al. (2008); Balestra et al. (2001); Courant et al. (1977); Goussu et al. (1966). Secondly, pion-induced reactions are superior to the previously studied proton- and photon-induced reactions. Due to the large inelastic cross section, hadron production occurs close to the upstream surface of the nucleus, leading on average to a longer path of the produced hadrons inside the nuclear matter. Because of the much lower production cross sections of the mesons in proton-induced reactions, secondary processes are non-negligible, causing shorter path lengths, just as in photon-induced reactions where the incident photons penetrate deeply into the nucleus.
In this work we present the first measurement of the direct coupling of the to antikaon properties within nuclear matter, showing that for both mesons a strong absorption is observed when comparing to reactions at a -momentum of GeV/.
The experiment was performed with the High Acceptance DiElectron Spectrometer (HADES) at the SIS18 at GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung in Darmstadt, Germany. HADES Agakishiev et al. (2009b) is a charged-particle detector consisting of a six-coiled toroidal magnet surrounding the beam axis with six identical detection sections. It features polar acceptance between and with an almost full azimuthal coverage. Each sector is equipped with a Ring-Imaging Cherenkov (RICH) detector followed by Mini-Drift Chambers (MDCs), two in front of and two behind the magnetic field, as well as two detectors for time-of-flight measurements, a scintillator hodoscope (TOF) and Resistive Plate Chamber (RPC), in combination with the target-T0 detector. In the following, the TOF-RPC system is referred to as Multiplicity Electron Trigger Array (META). Hadron identification is based on time-of-flight and on specific energy-loss (d/d) in the MDC tracking detectors.
A secondary beam of negatively charged pions with a rate of and a momentum of GeV/ was incident on carbon and tungsten targets each composed of three segments with a thickness of mm and mm, respectively. In order to measure the momentum of the secondary pion beam with a precision of , the CERBEROS tracking system Adamczewski-Musch et al. (2017) was employed. The first-level-trigger (LVL1) required a signal in the target-T0 detector and a minimum charged particle multiplicity in the META system. A total of and events were collected for and collisions, respectively.
Charged kaons were pre-identified on the basis of the specific energy-loss in the MDC as a function of the momentum (Wirth, 2017). The analyses of the and reactions were performed in two sets of kinematic variables: and in the laboratory frame. The (anti-)kaon yield was extracted by fitting the measured mass distributions (examples in panels (a) and (b) in Fig. 1) obtained for the different () intervals Wirth (2018a). The precision of the kaon mass measurement varies between and the resolution between 18.3 to 62.8 MeV/ over the different bins. The total number of reconstructed and for the analysis within the HADES acceptance in reactions are equal to and and in reactions are equal to and . Further, the obtained double-differential yields of and were corrected for reconstruction efficiency within the geometrical acceptance ( for and for ) and normalized to the total number of beam particles and the density of target atoms to obtain absolute cross-sections.
The resulting differential cross-sections for and produced in and reactions are shown in Fig. 2. Panels (a) and (b) show the distributions of the in three different rapidity intervals subdividing the range in and , respectively. Panel (c) depicts the distribution of the in 11 rapidity intervals subdividing the range . Panel (d) shows the analog for the system. The errors in Fig. 2 are the combined statistical and systematic, and normalization uncertainty. The systematic uncertainty was obtained by varying the two-dimensional (anti-)kaon identification cut such as to select candidates with respect to the standard analysis. Furthermore, the width of the Gaussian function used to fit the experimental (anti-)kaon mass distribution is fixed to the maximum allowed limits obtained from simulations Wirth (2017). The correction uncertainty corresponds to . The normalization error arises from the beam particle determination and is around .
Following the prescription already adopted in Agakishiev et al. (2013, 2014b); Adamczewski-Musch et al. (2018b), a Boltzmann fit (, where denotes a scaling factor, the nominal mass and the inverse-slope parameter) is applied to the measured spectra and the fit results are shown by the dashed lines in Fig. 2. The fits are used to extrapolate the measured distributions to uncovered transverse momentum regions. The resulting experimental rapidity density distribution for and are shown in panel (a) of Fig. 3. The extrapolation error corresponding to the uncertainty of the Boltzmann fit is the dominant contribution to the systematic uncertainty. The rapidity distribution for looks very different for the two colliding systems. (Elastic) scattering shifts the distribution to backward rapidity in the heavier target (W), while charge exchange is negligible Damerell et al. (1975). The shape of the rapidity distributions look similar for both nuclear environments, here absorption processes (e.g. ) are dominating. The integrated differential production cross-section () for () and () in and reactions inside the HADES acceptance are listed in Tab. 1.
In order to study the absorption inside the nuclear medium, a comparison of the ratio measured in collisions with heavy target (W) and lighter one (C) is done. In the double ratio the acts as a reference particle for the strange hadron production, because of its very low absorption cross-section. Therefore, the measured distribution is normalized to the integrated yield ().
The double ratio inside the HADES acceptance is moderately increasing with increasing as shown in panel (b) of Fig. 3. Within errors no significant dependence on the rapidity (panel (c) of Fig. 3), with and without extrapolation, is observed with an average value of in the latter case. In order to define a reference value in which no nuclear absorption is present, a double ratio was constructed from elementary reactions by taking into account the proper number of neutrons and protons in tungsten and carbon. This procedure results in a value of Wirth (2018a). The fact that the measured double ratios are well below this reference demonstrates the absorption.
The mesons were identified via their dominant decay channel into pairs ( Patrignani et al. (2016)). Both charged kaons were selected by a vs. momentum cut (, = 493.677 MeV/ Patrignani et al. (2016)). The contamination from other particle species was further reduced by selecting a reconstructed (anti-)kaon mass interval of . Further, the nominal mass was attributed to the identified (anti-)kaon candidates. The resulting invariant mass distribution for and collisions normalized to the number of LVL1 events is shown in panel (c) of Fig. 1. A clear peak is visible and the signal can be described by the sum of two Gaussian distributions to account for finite resolution effects as well as for the re-scattering of the and inside the targets. The background is modeled by a third-order polynomial together with a Gaussian to account for the mass threshold ().
The precision of the mass measurement is better than 1 MeV and the mass resolutions are and for C and W targets, respectively. In total and mesons are reconstructed. The acceptance and efficiency was determined by simulating the reaction and values of were obtained. As these corrections strongly depend on the kinematics, a differential correction as a function of () was evaluated Wirth (2018b). Since the limited statistics does not allow for a double differential analysis, each candidate is weighted with its corresponding correction factor and an integrated invariant mass spectrum is built. The same fitting procedure employed for the uncorrected invariant mass distribution to extract the raw yields was applied also to the corrected spectra. After the correction for the branching ratio the integrated differential production cross-sections () within the HADES acceptance ( and ) for and are listed in Tab. 1. The systematic uncertainty was evaluated by varying the invariant mass binning with respect to the standard analysis as well as by changing the order of the polynominal used to fit the background from third to a second order. The correction uncertainty corresponds to for each kaon.
The absorption can be quantified in terms of the transparency ratio defined as . This value is equal to and hence smaller than the results obtained in by ANKE Polyanskiy et al. (2011) and by CLAS Wood et al. (2010) for slightly bigger nuclei (, ). The lower transparency ratio found in pion-induced reactions maybe attributed to the already mentioned large reaction cross-section and the negligible contribution of secondary reactions that leads to production near the upstream surface, allowing the hadron to travel a longer path within the nucleus than in proton- and photon-induced reactions.
The ratio was evaluated for both collision systems inside the HADES acceptance. For this investigation it has to be considered that the and phase space coverage of HADES is different ( and , and ). As shown in panel (a) of Fig. 3 the shape of the rapidity distributions do not depend on the target. To demonstrate that also the distributions share the same feature, GiBUU simulations were carried out for the systems and no bias due to the HADES geometrical acceptance was found.
The measured ratio within the HADES acceptance is for and for collisions. The main systematic error arises from the difference in the and analyses. Within errors the two ratios are in agreement. Since the double ratio (panel (b) in Fig. 3) clearly indicates a larger absorption in the W target and since the ratios are the same for both targets, also a stronger absorption in W is observed. This demonstrates that both resonant and non-resonant channels are affected in the medium in the same way.
In summary, the inclusive production cross-sections of charged kaons and mesons in collisions within the HADES acceptance were measured. The rapidity density distributions for and produced on heavy (W) and light (C) nuclei were compared. Strong scattering effects are observed shifting the maximum of the distribution to backward rapidity in the heavier target, while the shape of the distribution is comparable in both targets. The measured double ratio given in Tab. 2 is well below the expected (anti-)kaon production reference based on elementary reactions, directly indicating sizable absorption in heavy nuclei (W) with respect to light ones (C). The ratios for and reactions within the HADES acceptance listed in in Tab. 2 are consistent within the uncertainties pointing to a non-negligible absorption. This finding is in line with the extracted transparency ratio of , which is lower than observed by ANKE Polyanskiy et al. (2011) and CLAS Wood et al. (2010) measurements. This first measurement of kaons and in the same reactions provides experimental evidence of the strong coupling between the and dynamics within nuclear matter.
The HADES Collaboration gratefully acknowledges the support given by the following institutions and agencies: SIP JUC Cracow, Cracow (Poland), 2017/26/M/ST2/00600; TU Darmstadt, Darmstadt (Germany), ExtreMe Matter Institute EMMI at GSI Darmstadt; Goethe-University, Frankfurt (Germany), ExtreMe Matter Institute EMMI at GSI Darmstadt; TU München, Garching (Germany), MLL München, DFG EClust 153, GSI TMLRG1316F, BmBF 05P15WOFCA, SFB 1258, DFG FAB898/2-2; NRNU MEPhI Moscow, Moscow (Russia), in framework of Russian Academic Excellence Project 02.a03.21.0005, Ministry of Science and Education of the Russian Federation 3.3380.2017/4.6; JLU Giessen, Giessen (Germany), BMBF:05P12RGGHM; IPN Orsay, Orsay Cedex (France), CNRS/IN2P3; NPI CAS, Rez, Rez (Czech Republic), MSMT LM2015049, OP VVV CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16 013/0001677, LTT17003.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Kaiser et al. (1995) N. Kaiser, P. B. Siegel, and W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A 594 , 325 (1995) . · doi ↗
- 2Oset and Ramos (1998) E. Oset and A. Ramos, Nucl. Phys. A 635 , 99 (1998) . · doi ↗
- 3Patrignani et al. (2016) C. Patrignani et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C 40 , 100001 (2016) . · doi ↗
- 4Hartnack et al. (2012) C. Hartnack, H. Oeschler, Y. Leifels, E. L. Bratkovskaya, and J. Aichelin, Phys. Rep. 510 , 119 (2012) . · doi ↗
- 5Agakishiev et al. (2014 a) G. Agakishiev et al. (HADES), Phys. Rev. C 90 , 054906 (2014 a) . · doi ↗
- 6Zinyuk et al. (2014) V. Zinyuk et al. (FOPI), Phys. Rev. C 90 , 025210 (2014) . · doi ↗
- 7Metag et al. (2017) V. Metag, M. Nanova, and E. Ya. Paryev, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97 , 199 (2017) . · doi ↗
- 8Agakishiev et al. (2009 a) G. Agakishiev et al. (HADES), Phys. Rev. C 80 , 025209 (2009 a) . · doi ↗
