Dice in the Black Box: User Experiences with an Inscrutable Algorithm
Aaron Springer, Victoria Hollis, Steve Whittaker

TL;DR
This study reveals how users tend to trust seemingly intelligent black box algorithms, even when such systems operate randomly, highlighting the need for safeguards to prevent misplaced trust.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates the susceptibility of users to trust inscrutable algorithms and offers insights into their trust-building processes and potential corrective measures.
Findings
Users often trust black box algorithms despite randomness.
Trust is influenced by perceived intelligence and framing.
Recommendations for reducing unwarranted trust in AI systems.
Abstract
We demonstrate that users may be prone to place an inordinate amount of trust in black box algorithms that are framed as intelligent. We deploy an algorithm that purportedly assesses the positivity and negativity of a users' writing emotional writing. In actuality, the algorithm responds in a random fashion. We qualitatively examine the paths to trust that users followed while testing the system. In light of the ease with which users may trust systems exhibiting "intelligent behavior" we recommend corrective approaches.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Mental Health via Writing
