# A duality principle for groups II: Multi-frames meet super-frames

**Authors:** Radu Balan, Dorin Ervin Dutkay, Deguang Han, David Larson, Franz Luef

arXiv: 1812.03019 · 2018-12-10

## TL;DR

This paper generalizes the duality principle in Gabor analysis to broader group representations, showing that multi-frame and super-frame generators are interconnected through dual commutant pairs, extending fundamental properties like biorthogonality and the fundamental identity.

## Contribution

It introduces a more general duality theorem linking multi-frame and super-frame generators via dual commutant pairs in group representation theory, applicable to Gabor systems.

## Key findings

- Establishes that multi-frame generators form frames iff associated unions are Riesz sequences.
- Shows that unions of Gabor systems are frames iff corresponding combined systems are Riesz sequences.
- Extends fundamental properties of Gabor analysis to general projective unitary group representations.

## Abstract

The duality principle for group representations developed in \cite{DHL-JFA, HL_BLM} exhibits a fact that the well-known duality principle in Gabor analysis is not an isolated incident but a more general phenomenon residing in the context of group representation theory. There are two other well-known fundamental properties in Gabor analysis: The Wexler-Raz biorthogonality and the Fundamental Identity of Gabor analysis. In this paper we will show that these fundamental properties remain to be true for general projective unitary group representations. The main purpose of this paper is present a more general duality theorem which shows that that muti-frame generators meet super-frame generators through a dual commutant pairs. In particular, for the Gabor representations $\pi_{\Lambda}$ and $\pi_{\Lambda^{o}}$ with respect to a pair of dual time-frequency lattices $\Lambda$ and $\Lambda^{o}$ in $\R^{d}\times \R^{d}$ we have that $\{\pi_{\Lambda}(m, n)g_{1} \oplus ... \oplus \pi_{\Lambda}(m, n)g_{k}\}_{m, n \in \Z^{d}}$ is a frame for $L^{2}(\R^{d})\oplus ... \oplus L^{2}(\R^{d})$ if and only if $\cup_{i=1}^{k}\{\pi_{\Lambda^{o}}(m, n)g_{i}\}_{m, n\in\Z^{d}}$ is a Riesz sequence, and $\cup_{i=1}^{k}\{\pi_{\Lambda}(m, n)g_{i}\}_{m, n\in\Z^{d}}$ is a frame for $L^{2}(\R^{d})$ if and only if $\{\pi_{\Lambda^{o}}(m, n)g_{1} \oplus ... \oplus \pi_{\Lambda^{o}}(m, n)g_{k}\}_{m, n \in \Z^{d}}$ is a Riesz sequence. This appears to be new even in the context of Gabor analysis.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.03019/full.md

## References

34 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.03019/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.03019