Positive ground state solutions for fractional Laplacian system with one critical exponent and one subcritical exponent
Maoding Zhen, Jinchun He, Haoyuan Xu, Meihua Yang

TL;DR
This paper investigates the existence of positive ground state solutions for a fractional Laplacian system with mixed critical and subcritical nonlinearities, identifying parameter regimes for existence and non-existence.
Contribution
It introduces new conditions on parameters ensuring the existence of positive ground state solutions using the Nehari manifold approach.
Findings
Existence of solutions for small when
Existence of solutions for large when
Non-existence of solutions below a certain threshold
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the following fractional Laplacian system with one critical exponent and one subcritical exponent \begin{equation*} \begin{cases} (-\Delta)^{s}u+\mu u=|u|^{p-1}u+\lambda v & x\in \ \mathbb{R}^{N}, (-\Delta)^{s}v+\nu v = |v|^{2^{\ast}-2}v+\lambda u& x\in \ \mathbb{R}^{N},\\ \end{cases} \end{equation*} where is the fractional Laplacian, ~ is the Sobolev critical exponent. By using the Nehari\ manifold, we show that there exists a , such that when , the system has a positive ground state solution. When , there exists a such that if , the system has a positive ground state solution, if , the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNonlinear Partial Differential Equations · Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering · Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Positive ground state solutions for fractional Laplacian system with one critical exponent and one subcritical exponent
Maoding Zhen1,2, Jinchun He1,2,Haoyuan Xu1,2,∗,Meihua Yang1,2
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology,
Wuhan 430074, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Engineering Modeling and Scientific Computing, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the following fractional Laplacian system with one critical exponent and one subcritical exponent
[TABLE]
where is the fractional Laplacian, is the Sobolev critical exponent. By using the Nehari manifold, we show that there exists a , such that when , the system has a positive ground state solution. When , there exists a such that if , the system has a positive ground state solution, if , the system has no ground state solution.
Keywords: fractional Laplacian; critical exponent; subcritical exponent; ground state solution
000 ∗ Corresponding author.
AMS Subject Classification: 35J50, 35B33, 35R11
The authors were supported by the NSFC grant 11571125.
1 Introduction
In the past decades, the Laplacian equation or system has been widely investigated and there are many results about ground state solutions, multiple positive solutions, sign-changing solutions, etc(see [30, 31, 11, 13, 14, 12, 15] and references therein).
Compared to the Laplacian problem, the fractional Laplacian problem is non-local and more challenging. Recently, a great attention has been focused on the study of fractional and non-local operators of elliptic type, both for the pure mathematical research and in view of concrete real-world applications(see [4, 16, 28, 8, 34, 7, 36, 21] and references therein). This type of operator arises in a quite natural way in many different contexts, such as, the thin obstacle problem, finance, phase transitions, anomalous diffusion, flame propagation and many others(see[2, 18, 29, 37] and references therein).
For the case of fractional Laplacian equation, the existence and nonexistence of solutions has been studied by many researchers. For example
[TABLE]
has been studied by many authors under various hypotheses on the nonlinearity . Such as, Wang and Zhou [38] obtained the existence of a radial sign-changing solution for equation (1.1) by using variational method and Brouwer degree theory. When the nonlinearity satisfies the general hypotheses introduced by Berestycki and Lions [6], Chang and Wang [10] proved the existence of a radially symmetric ground state solution with the help of the Pohozǎev identity for (1.1). However, in all these works, they only consider the existence and nonexistence solutions, but there are few results about the uniqueness of solution for fractional Laplacian equation. In the remarkable papers [25][26], for the subcritical case, when , R.L. Frank and E. Lenzmann [25] showed the uniqueness of non-linear ground states solutions to the equation (1.1) for one dimension case and R.L. Frank, E. Lenzmann and L. Silvestre [26] showed the general unique ground state solution to the equation (1.1) for dimension great than one.
It is also nature to study the coupled system. For the following fractional Laplacian system,
[TABLE]
has been investigated by many authors under various hypotheses on the nonlinearity and . For example, when , D.F. Lü, S.J. Peng [24] showed that under suitable condition of , it has a vector ground state solution for . When , M. D. Zhen, J. C. He and H. Y. Xu [40] showed that the existence and nonexistence of ground state solutions under suitable condition of and Z. Guo, S. Luo and W. Zou [21] showed that under suitable condition of the system has a positive ground state solution for all . When , Q. Guo and X. He [20] proved the existence of a least energy solution via Nehari manifold method and showed that if is large enough, it has a positive least energy solution. Note that in all these works, they only consider subcritical case or critical case. As far as we know, there are few results for the fractional Laplacian system with one subcritical equation and one critical equation. In this paper, we consider the following fractional Laplacian system with one critical exponent and one subcritical exponent on . In the case of Laplacian system, the problem has been investigated by Z. Chen, W. Zou in [12].
The system we consider is the following
[TABLE]
where is the fractional Laplacian, is the Sobolev critical exponent. The fractional Laplacian is defined by
[TABLE]
with
[TABLE]
Let be the Hilbert space defined as the completion of with the scalar product
[TABLE]
and norm
[TABLE]
Let be the Hilbert space of function in endowed with the standard scalar product and norm
[TABLE]
Let be the sharp constant of the Sobolev embedding
[TABLE]
and let be the sharp imbedding constant of
[TABLE]
From [17] we have is attained in by , where and .
Denote and , with the norm given by
[TABLE]
where .
The energy functional associated with (1.2) is given by
[TABLE]
Define the Nehari manifold
[TABLE]
We say that is a nontrivial solution of (1.2) if and solves (1.2). Any nontrivial solution of (1.2) is in . Due to the fact that if we take with and , then there exist such that , so .
Let
[TABLE]
Our main result is:
Theorem 1.1**.**
*Assume and . Let be in (1.6).
If then the system (1.2) has a positive ground state solution.
If then there exists such that,*
* if , the system (1.2) has no ground state solution.*
* if , the system (1.2) has a positive ground state solution.*
We sketch our idea of the proof. It is well known that the Sobolev embedding are not compact for . Hence, the associated functional of problem (1.2) does not satisfy the Palais-Smale condition. In order to overcome the lack of compactness, we first set our work space in , where
[TABLE]
and is endowed with the topology: . Let
[TABLE]
By properties of symmetric radial decreasing rearrangement, we know is achieved by radial functions in and is achieved by radial functions in . By principle of symmetric criticality (Theorem 1.28 in [39]), the solutions for (1.2) in function space are also the solutions in function space .
Second, we show that if the critical value of the functional (1.5) is strictly less than , then the corresponding critical sequence will satisfy condition.
Finally, we prove that mountain pass value for (1.5) is less than under some proper conditions.
Remark 1.1**.**
The proof of Theorem 1.1 is totally variational. We do not need to use the regularity of the solutions to the system (1.2)(For the fractional Laplacian equation, there are no general results for regularity(of the solutions) higher than the one derived from the Sobolev imbedding). The method we use here is different from the one used in[12], where they use a limiting argument to deal with the problem in Laplacian case and the regularity of the solutions are needed.
The paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we introduce some preliminaries that will be used to prove Theorem 1.1. In section 3, we prove Theorem 1.1.
2 Some Preliminaries
As mentioned earlier, we will only work in the radial function space. Set and as the following
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
with norm deduced from and respectively. Define the Nehari Manifold in as
[TABLE]
Theorem 1.1 is proved by Mountain Pass Theorem [1], we first show that has a sequence in . Choose with and , then there exists such that for all . Take with large enough. Let
[TABLE]
Define
[TABLE]
Lemma 2.1**.**
Under the condition , there exists a Palais-Smale sequence such that
[TABLE]
Proof.
We first claim that possesses a mountain pass geometry around ;
(1) there exist , such that for all ;
(2) there exist such that and .
To claim (1), since , we can take a small such that , then by Sobolev imbedding,
[TABLE]
Choose sufficiently small, if , then
[TABLE]
(2) is obvious when we choose large enough such that .
By Mountain Pass Theorem [1], for the constant there exist a sequence , that is
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
∎
Define
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Lemma 2.2**.**
Under the condition , .
Proof.
We first claim . For any with , there exist a unique such that
[TABLE]
where satisfies and
[TABLE]
Which implies that . From (2.2), we get for any , ,
[TABLE]
therefore . Similarly, we can show that , thus .
Next, we claim
For any , we can take a such that
[TABLE]
We take a two dimensional space in contain and and we choose a large , such that for all with . Now, we define a path connecting and as follows. If , let which is the segment connecting and . If , let be the arc in , satisfying and If define which is a segment connecting and Let then it is easy to check that
[TABLE]
which implies that Thus
Let is a sequence, then
[TABLE]
We claim is bounded in . For large enough, we have since , we can take a small such that , then by Sobolev imbedding
[TABLE]
Consequently, is bounded in . Since , is not .
Let , from
[TABLE]
it is easy to see that as . So
[TABLE]
Consequently, . This completes the proof of Lemma 2.2. ∎
Remark 2.1**.**
By properties of symmetric radial decreasing rearrangement, it is easy to show that the value defined in is the same as the value defined in . So the ground state solution in is also the ground state solution in .
In order to prove Theorem 1.1, we need the following lemma.
Lemma 2.3**.**
([5]Brezis-Lieb Lemma) Let , . If is bounded in and , then
[TABLE]
Next, we borrow some ideas form [12]. Define
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and denote . Then we have following Lemma.
Lemma 2.4**.**
For any with and , there holds
[TABLE]
Proof.
Since , we have
[TABLE]
Moreover, there exist such that
[TABLE]
Since and is increasing in , decreasing in , is increasing in , decreasing in . Thus, if , then and If , then and This completes the proof. ∎
By [25, 26], there exists a unique positive radial ground state solution to the equation in . By (1.3),
[TABLE]
where is defined in (2.5). Let , then is the unique positive radial solution of with the energy
[TABLE]
For convenience, we denote . Define then
[TABLE]
Let , we have the following Lemma:
Lemma 2.5**.**
There exists a constant with such that
[TABLE]
Proof.
By (1.6) and (2.7), we have Since , we have
[TABLE]
From (2.7) it is easy to obtain (2.8). In order to prove , by (2.8) we need to show By Hölder inequality and Young inequality, we have
[TABLE]
If we choose such that
[TABLE]
then, we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
This implies that . Combining this with (2.7), we obtain
[TABLE]
If we choose
[TABLE]
we have . Thus, This completes the proof. ∎
Remark 2.2**.**
From the proof of the above lemma, though the exact values of and are unknown, we have a lower bound estimate for and an upper bound estimate for :
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Since , it is easy to deduce that .
For any , we define a function by
[TABLE]
Then,
[TABLE]
Thus, as and is increasing in Therefore, there exists such that
[TABLE]
Since , we have
[TABLE]
Lemma 2.6**.**
*(1)If then
(2)If , then there exists a such that*
* if then ;*
* if then
where is from (2.10).*
Proof.
(1) If by Lemma 2.5, we have
[TABLE]
Thus
When then Assume by contradiction that , then
[TABLE]
Thus, is a ground state solution of (1.2). Since , if is a ground state solution of (1.2), then This contract with so
(2) In order to prove second part of Lemma 2.6, we divide into two steps.
Step 1 We first show that for any fixed if , then
[TABLE]
First, we show that the single equation
[TABLE]
has no nontrivial solutions.
In deed, by the similar arguments as Lemma 2.1 and Lemma 2.2, we know that the energy functional for equation (2.13) has mountain pass structure and bounded sequence. It is well know that if the least energy for strictly less than , then (2.13) has nontrivial solutions.
Let us now consider the cut-off function such that and For every we let , where , is attained by . Then, the following estimates holds true(Proposition 21 in [35])
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Then, using the above estimates and by the similar arguments as [35], we can show that the least energy for equation (2.13) can not strictly less than . So, (2.13) has no nontrivial solutions.
Thus, it is easily seen that is also the sharp constant of
[TABLE]
which implies that
[TABLE]
On the other hand, assume then . By the same arguments as Lemma 2.2, we have
[TABLE]
By (1.4), we have
[TABLE]
For any if then If then If and , then by Lemma 2.4 and Lemma 2.5, we have
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
Combining (2.14) with (2.15), we obtain
Step 2 We prove in .
Let , we define
[TABLE]
where is from (2.10).
Then,
[TABLE]
By Lemma 2.5 we have that is equivalent to
[TABLE]
By (2.9) and (2.10), we can deduce that the above inequality is equivalent to Combining this with (2.11), for any we have Define
[TABLE]
Then, by (2.12), we know and for any there holds This completes the proof of .
We show that which implies immediately.
By (2.14), we have By the definition of there exists such that
[TABLE]
For any there exist such that Since we have as where satisfies Then,
[TABLE]
This implies
[TABLE]
Thus,
Next, we claim is non-increasing with respect to
Since
[TABLE]
then we have
[TABLE]
Let Then for any and we have
[TABLE]
Thus, Consequently, is non-increasing with respect to
Combining this fact with (2.12), we see that holds. This completes the proof. ∎
3 Proof of Theorem 1.1
Proof of Theorem 1.1.
By principle of symmetric criticality (Theorem 1.28 in [39]), the solutions for (1.2) in function space are also the solutions in function space .
We prove Theorem 1.1 by two steps. First, we prove the existence of ground state solutions for system (1.2) in step 1, then we claim there exist a positive ground state solution.
Step 1. Prove the existence of ground state solutions for system (1.2).
By (2.1) and the proof of Lemma 2.2, there exists a bounded sequence , such that
[TABLE]
Thus, by Sobolev Imbedding Theorem, there exist such that
[TABLE]
If , then we have
[TABLE]
Let and . We claim
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
By Lemma 2.3, there holds
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Since
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Combining (3.5)-(3.9) with (3.10) , we obtain identity (3.3).
Since, for any , we have
[TABLE]
By Vatali’s Theorem [32], we have
[TABLE]
Similarly, we have
[TABLE]
By (3.11), (3.12), (3.13), we obtain identity (3.4).
Thus, by (3.2),(3.3), (3.4) and Lemma 2.2, we deduce
[TABLE]
which gives that
[TABLE]
On the other hand, by (3.4), we have
[TABLE]
Since , we can take a small such that , by Sobolev imbedding, (3.14) and (3.15), we find
[TABLE]
which implies that
[TABLE]
As a result, is a critical point of and satisfies
[TABLE]
By Lemma 2.2, we obtain
[TABLE]
If , by (3.15) and
[TABLE]
We have
[TABLE]
Assuming by contradiction, we can assume without loss of generality that
[TABLE]
By (3.15) and Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we have
[TABLE]
By Sobolev imbedding , we have
[TABLE]
Combining (3.17) with (3.18), we can deduce that
[TABLE]
Let in (3.16), we obtain
[TABLE]
This contradict with Lemma 2.6.
Consequently, and . That is is a nontrivial solution of system (1.2).
Step 2. We claim that there exist a positive ground state solution.
Since
[TABLE]
hence,
[TABLE]
Then, for the minimizing sequence , we have
[TABLE]
this implies that there exists such that Hence, we can choose a minimizing sequence and the weak limit is nonnegative. By Strong maximum principle for fractional Laplacian( see, Proposition 2.17 in [37]), we have and are both positive.
Next, we claim if and , then system (1.2) has no ground state solution.
Assume by contradiction that there exist such that system (1.2) has a ground state solution . Then By (2.16) and (2.17) we may assume that by Strong maximum principle for fractional Laplacian( see Proposition 2.17 in [37]), we have If we take , then by Lemma 2.6 and (2.2), we have
[TABLE]
a contradiction. This completes the proof. ∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] A. Ambrosetti and P.H. Rabinowitz, Dual variational methods in critical point theory and applications, J. Funct. Anal. , 14(1973), 349–381.
- 2[2] G. Alberti, G. Bouchitt and P. Seppecher, Phase transition with the line-tension effect, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. , 144(1998), 1–46.
- 3[3] C.O. Alves, D.C. de Morais Filho and M.A.S. Souto, On systems of elliptic equations involving subcritical or critical Sobolev exponents, Nonlinear Anal. , 42(2000), 771–787.
- 4[4] B. Barrios, E. Colorado, A. de Pablo and U. Sánchez, On some critical problems for the fractional Laplacian operator, J. Differential Equations , 252(2012), 6133–6162.
- 5[5] H. Brezis and E. Lieb, A relation between pointwise convergence of functions and functionals, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 88(1983), 486–490.
- 6[6] H. Berestycki and P. L. Lions, Nonlinear scalar field equations (I): Existence of a ground state, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. , 82(1983), 247–375.
- 7[7] X. Cabré and Y. Sire, Nonlinear equations for fractional Laplacians, I: Regularity, maximum principles, and Hamiltonian estimates, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar Anal. Non Lin aire , 31(2014), 23–53.
- 8[8] L. Caffarelli, J. Roquejoffre and Y. Sire, Variational problems with free boundaries for the fractional Laplacian, J. Eur. Math. Soc. , 12(2010), 1151–1179.
