# Test-field limit of metric nonlinear gravity theories

**Authors:** Guido Magnano, Krzysztof A. Meissner, Leszek M. Soko{\L}Owski

arXiv: 1812.02961 · 2019-09-04

## TL;DR

This paper investigates whether higher-derivative metric gravity theories admit a test-field limit for their fundamental fields, revealing limitations in models with 8 degrees of freedom that could impact their physical viability.

## Contribution

It demonstrates that most higher-derivative gravity models with 8 degrees of freedom lack a proper test-field limit, unlike simpler f(R) theories, highlighting a potential fundamental issue.

## Key findings

- f(R) theories have a test-field limit
- Most quadratic Ricci tensor models do not have a test-field limit
- Adding Weyl tensor terms does not restore the test-field limit

## Abstract

In the framework of alternative metric gravity theories, it has been shown by several authors that a generic Lagrangian depending on the Riemann tensor describes a theory with 8 degrees of freedom (which reduce to 3 for f(R) Lagrangians depending only on the curvature scalar). This result is often related to a reformulation of the fourth-order equations for the metric into a set of second-order equations for a multiplet of fields, including a massive scalar field and a massive spin-2 field. In this article we investigate an issue which does not seem to have been addressed so far: in ordinary general-relativistic field theories, all fundamental fields (i.e. fields with definite spin and mass) reduce to test fields in some appropriate limit of the model, where they cease to act as sources for the metric curvature. In this limit, each of the fundamental fields can be excited from its ground state independently from the others. The question is: does higher-derivative gravity admit a test-field limit for its fundamental fields? It is easy to show that for a f(R) theory the test-field limit does exist; then, we consider the case of Lagrangians quadratically depending on the full Ricci tensor. We show that the constraint binding together the scalar field and the massive spin-2 field does not disappear in the limit where they should be expected to act as test fields, except for a particular choice of the Lagrangian, which cause the scalar field to disappear (reducing to 7 DOF). We finally consider the addition of an arbitrary function of the quadratic invariant of the Weyl tensor and show that the resulting model still lacks a proper test-field limit. We argue that the lack of a test-field limit for the fundamental fields may constitute a serious drawback of the full 8 DOF higher-order gravity models, which is not encountered in the restricted 7 DOF or 3 DOF cases.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.02961/full.md

## References

42 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.02961/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.02961