Three Tools for Practical Differential Privacy
Koen Lennart van der Veen, Ruben Seggers, Peter Bloem, Giorgio Patrini

TL;DR
This paper introduces three practical tools to improve the usability and effectiveness of differentially private machine learning, addressing interpretability, hyperparameter tuning, and privacy testing challenges.
Contribution
The paper presents three novel tools: sanity checks, an adaptive clipping bound, and large-batch training, to enhance practical differential privacy implementation.
Findings
Sanity checks help verify privacy guarantees before training.
Adaptive clipping reduces the need for extensive hyperparameter tuning.
Large-batch training improves model performance under differential privacy.
Abstract
Differentially private learning on real-world data poses challenges for standard machine learning practice: privacy guarantees are difficult to interpret, hyperparameter tuning on private data reduces the privacy budget, and ad-hoc privacy attacks are often required to test model privacy. We introduce three tools to make differentially private machine learning more practical: (1) simple sanity checks which can be carried out in a centralized manner before training, (2) an adaptive clipping bound to reduce the effective number of tuneable privacy parameters, and (3) we show that large-batch training improves model performance.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Cryptography and Data Security · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
