
TL;DR
This paper argues that truly autonomous machines can be ethical, and developing this theory clarifies ethical obligations and responsibility in AI, potentially leading to a unified ethical framework for humans and machines.
Contribution
It develops a theoretical framework linking autonomy and ethics in artificial intelligence, addressing obligations and responsibility issues.
Findings
Autonomy can be ethically grounded in machines.
Understanding machine autonomy clarifies ethical obligations.
A unified ethical theory for humans and AI is possible.
Abstract
While many see the prospect of autonomous machines as threatening, autonomy may be exactly what we want in a superintelligent machine. There is a sense of autonomy, deeply rooted in the ethical literature, in which an autonomous machine is necessarily an ethical one. Development of the theory underlying this idea not only reveals the advantages of autonomy, but it sheds light on a number of issues in the ethics of artificial intelligence. It helps us to understand what sort of obligations we owe to machines, and what obligations they owe to us. It clears up the issue of assigning responsibility to machines or their creators. More generally, a concept of autonomy that is adequate to both human and artificial intelligence can lead to a more adequate ethical theory for both.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
