Odd Fibbinary Numbers and the Golden Ratio
Linus Lindroos, Andrew Sills, and Hua Wang

TL;DR
None
Contribution
None
Abstract
The fibbinary numbers are positive integers whose binary representation contains no consecutive ones. We prove the following result: If the th odd fibbinary is the th \emph{odd} fibbinary number, then
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Odd fibbinary numbers
and the golden ratio
Linus Lindroos
Linus Lindroos
Department of Mathematical Sciences
Georgia Southern University
Statesboro, GA 30460, USA
,
Andrew Sills
Andrew Sills
Department of Mathematical Sciences
Georgia Southern University
Statesboro, GA 30460, USA
and
Hua Wang
Hua Wang
Department of Mathematical Sciences
Georgia Southern University
Statesboro, GA 30460, USA
Abstract.
The fibbinary numbers are positive integers whose binary representation contains no consecutive ones. We prove the following result: If the th odd fibbinary is the th odd fibbinary number, then
The work of the third author was partially supported by a grant from the Simons Foundation (#245307).
1. Background
The Fibonacci numbers are given by , , and
[TABLE]
for
Recall the following theorem of Zeckendorf [1]:
Zeckendorf’s theorem**.**
Every positive integer can be written uniquely as the sum of distinct, nonconsecutive Fibonacci numbers.
The Zeckendorf representation of is the unique -tuple of decreasing nonconsecutive Fibonacci numbers whose sum is . Note that although , we always associate with in the Zeckendorf representation.
For example,
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
The sequence of fibbinary numbers111According to [3], the name “fibbinary” is due to Marc LeBrun: “…integers whose binary representation contains no consecutive ones and noticed that the number of such numbers with bits was .”—posting to sci.math by Bob Jenkins, July 17, 2002. is given as follows: For , if is the Zeckendorf representation of , then
[TABLE]
For example,
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where the subscript indicates the usual binary (base two) representation.
2. Statement of main result relating odd fibbinaries to the golden ratio
It is easy to generate the odd fibbinary numbers from the binary representations and find the corresponding value of the original integer, e.g.,
- •
;
- •
;
- •
;
- •
.
Let denote the th odd fibbinary number, i.e.,
[TABLE]
Let
[TABLE]
so that
[TABLE]
In other words, if the th odd fibbinary number is the th fibbinary number, then .
This sequence
[TABLE]
appears to be “A003622” in OEIS [2], defined as
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
is the golden ratio, which satisfies , and of course arises as
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
The correspondence displayed above is naturally conjectured to be true in general.
Theorem 2.1**.**
Let be a positive integer such that the th fibbinary number is odd. Suppose that this th fibbinary number is the th odd fibbinary number. Then
[TABLE]
for any .
3. Proof of Theorem 2.1
It is easy to check that (2) is true for small values of . In the rest of this note we provide a general proof for .
Next, we record the following observation on as a lemma.
Lemma 3.1**.**
For any and , we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
Immediate as each digit in the binary representation of corresponds to a specific Fibonacci number. ∎
For example,
[TABLE]
Lemma 3.2**.**
For any and , we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
Since each digit in the binary representation of corresponds to a distinct Fibonacci number in the sum of under the Zeckendorf representation, we can claim the same for . That is,
[TABLE]
∎
For example,
[TABLE]
From Lemma 3.2, we have
[TABLE]
for and
[TABLE]
Now to show (2) for any , we only need to show analogues of (3) and (4) for , i.e.,
[TABLE]
for , and
[TABLE]
Remark**.**
Intuitively, this can be considered as using as the “stepping stone” to prove (2) for for using induction.
In order to establish (5), it is essentially sufficient to show that is never large enough to affect the difference , where , the fractional part of the real number .
We make use of the following fact, which is easily established by induction in :
[TABLE]
where satisfying . Consequently,
[TABLE]
for any .
Making use of the fact that , it suffices to show
[TABLE]
To show (8), simply consider
[TABLE]
for any . We will show that this value never reaches 1 or goes below zero and hence will not affect .
(i) To show , consider the Zeckendorf representation of as the sum of non-consecutive Fibonacci numbers.
If , then
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
If , we have
[TABLE]
for any .
(ii) To show , simply note that
[TABLE]
if and
[TABLE]
if .
Cases (i) and (ii) imply that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Fact (7) implies that
[TABLE]
for . Thus (9) and hence (6) is proved. ∎
Acknowledgements
We thank the anonymous referee for carefully reading the manuscript and providing helpful suggestions.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] E. Zeckendorf, Représentation des nombres naturales par une somme des nombres de Fibonacci ou de nombres de Lucas , Soc. Roy. Sci. Liège 41 (1972) 179–182.
- 2[2] Sequence A 003622, OEIS, http://oeis.org/A 003622 .
- 3[3] Sequence A 003714, OEIS, http://oeis.org/A 003714 .
