# Measurement of inclusive very forward jet cross sections in proton-lead   collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} =$ 5.02 TeV

**Authors:** CMS Collaboration

arXiv: 1812.01691 · 2019-05-21

## TL;DR

This paper measures very forward jet production cross sections in proton-lead collisions at 5.02 TeV, comparing data to models and exploring gluon saturation effects at low momentum fractions.

## Contribution

It provides the first detailed measurement of forward jet cross sections in p+Pb collisions at this energy, highlighting discrepancies with existing models.

## Key findings

- Models do not fully describe the data across all energies and configurations.
- Discrepancies of over two orders of magnitude between data and predictions.
- Cross section ratios reveal insights into gluon saturation phenomena.

## Abstract

Measurements of differential cross sections for inclusive very forward jet production in proton-lead collisions as a function of jet energy are presented. The data were collected with the CMS experiment at the LHC in the laboratory pseudorapidity range $-$6.6 $<$ $\eta$ $<$ $-$5.2. Asymmetric beam energies of 4 TeV for protons and 1.58 TeV per nucleon for Pb nuclei were used, corresponding to a center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair of $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} =$ 5.02 TeV. Collisions with either the proton (p+Pb) or the ion (Pb+p) traveling towards the negative $\eta$ hemisphere are studied. The jet cross sections are unfolded to stable-particle level cross sections with $p_\mathrm{T}$ $\gtrsim$ 3 GeV, and compared to predictions from various Monte Carlo event generators. In addition, the cross section ratio of p+Pb and Pb+p data is presented. The results are discussed in terms of the saturation of gluon densities at low fractional parton momenta. None of the models under consideration describes all the data over the full jet-energy range and for all beam configurations. Discrepancies between the differential cross sections in data and model predictions of more than two orders of magnitude are observed.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.01691/full.md

## Figures

13 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.01691/full.md

## References

78 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.01691/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.01691