Cluster Cosmology Constraints from the 2500 deg$^2$ SPT-SZ Survey: Inclusion of Weak Gravitational Lensing Data from Magellan and the Hubble Space Telescope
S. Bocquet, J. P. Dietrich, T. Schrabback, L. E. Bleem, M. Klein, S., W. Allen, D. E. Applegate, M. L. N. Ashby, M. Bautz, M. Bayliss, B. A., Benson, M. Brodwin, E. Bulbul, R. E. A. Canning, R. Capasso, J. E. Carlstrom,, C. L. Chang, I. Chiu, H-M. Cho, A. Clocchiatti

TL;DR
This study uses a large galaxy cluster sample from the SPT-SZ survey, combined with weak lensing and X-ray data, to constrain cosmological parameters and test models like $ u ext{Λ}$CDM and $ u w$CDM, with results consistent with current theories.
Contribution
It presents the first cosmological constraints from the SPT-SZ survey incorporating weak lensing and X-ray data with minimal modeling assumptions.
Findings
Measured $oxed{ ext{Ω}_ ext{m}=0.276 extpm0.047}$ and $oxed{ ext{σ}_8=0.781 extpm0.037}$.
Found the evolution of X-ray observables consistent with self-similarity within 1σ.
Estimated dark energy parameter $w=-1.55 extpm0.41$.
Abstract
We derive cosmological constraints using a galaxy cluster sample selected from the 2500~deg SPT-SZ survey. The sample spans the redshift range and contains 343 clusters with SZ detection significance . The sample is supplemented with optical weak gravitational lensing measurements of 32 clusters with (from Magellan and HST) and X-ray measurements of 89 clusters with (from Chandra). We rely on minimal modeling assumptions: i) weak lensing provides an accurate means of measuring halo masses, ii) the mean SZ and X-ray observables are related to the true halo mass through power-law relations in mass and dimensionless Hubble parameter with a-priori unknown parameters, iii) there is (correlated, lognormal) intrinsic scatter and measurement noise relating these observables to their mean relations. We simultaneously fit for these…
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
