On osculating framing of real algebraic links
Grigory Mikhalkin, Stepan Orevkov

TL;DR
This paper establishes a relationship between the maximal encomplexed writhe and the maximal self-linking number with respect to osculating plane framing in real algebraic links, linking geometric and topological invariants.
Contribution
It proves that the maximal encomplexed writhe corresponds exactly to the maximal self-linking number with osculating plane framing for real algebraic links.
Findings
Maximal encomplexed writhe is characterized by maximal self-linking number.
The osculating plane framing plays a key role in understanding link invariants.
The result connects algebraic, geometric, and topological properties of real algebraic links.
Abstract
For a real algebraic link in , we prove that its encomplexed writhe (an invariant introduced by Viro) is maximal for a given degree and genus if and only if its self-linking number with respect to the framing by the osculating planes is maximal for a given degree.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
On osculating framing of real algebraic links
Grigory Mikhalkin and Stepan Orevkov
Université de Genève, Section de Mathématiques, Battelle Villa, 1227 Carouge, Suisse.
Steklov Mathematical Institute, Gubkina 8, 119991, Moscow, Russia; IMT, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062, Toulouse, France.
For a real algebraic link in , we prove that its encomplexed writhe (an invariant introduced by Viro) is maximal for a given degree and genus if and only if its self-linking number with respect to the framing by the osculating planes is maximal for a given degree.
††support: Research is supported in part by the SNSF-grants 159240, 159581, 182111 and the NCCR SwissMAP project (G.M.), and by RFBR grant No 17-01-00592a (S.O.)
1. Introduction and statement of the main result
By real algebraic curve in we mean a complex curve in invariant under complex conjugation. We use the same notation for a real curve and the set of its complex points and, if it is denoted by , then stands for the set of real points which is called a real algebraic link if it is non-empty and is smooth. A real algebraic link is called maximally writhed or -link if (a variation of Viro’s invariant [7]) attains the maximal possible value where and is the degree and genus of respectively. We refer to [3] for a precise definition of .
In [3, Thm. 2] we proved that several topological and geometric invariants are maximized on -links. In this paper we add one more item to this collection: we show that the self-linking number of with respect to the osculating framing attains its maximal value (for links of a given degree) if and only if is an -link. The proof is very similar to that of the main theorem of [3]. Let us give precise definitions and statements.
Let be an oriented link in a rational homology 3-sphere. A framing of is a continuous 1-dimensional subbundle of the normal bundle of or, equivalently, a continuous field (defined on ) of 2-dimensional planes tangent to . Given a framed oriented link , its self-linking number is defined as follows. Let be an embedded annulus or Möbius band with core , tangent to the framing. Then the self-linking number is where the boundary of is oriented so that in .
For an oriented link in , the osculating framing is the framing defined by the field of osculating planes. We denote the self-linking number of with respect to this framing by . If is a non-oriented link and an orientation of , we use the notation which is self-explained.
Recall that a smooth irreducible real algebraic curve is called an -curve if has connected components where is the genus of . In this case divides into two halves. The boundary orientation on induced by any of these halves is called a complex orientation. The main result of the paper is the following.
Theorem 1
Let be an irreducible real algebraic link of degree and be an orientation of . Then:
**Remark. ** In the space of real algebraic links of a given degree and genus we can distinguish three kinds of “walls”. The walls of the first kind correspond to curves with a double point with real local branches. When crossing such walls, both invariants and are changed by . The walls of the second kind correspond to curves with a real double point with complex conjugate local branches. When crossing such walls, does change but does not. The third kind of wall corresponds to curves which have a local branch parametrized by in some affine chart. When crossing such a wall, does not change but does. So, in general, the invariants and are more or less independent. Nevertheless, Theorem 1 implies that the chamber where they have maximal value is bounded only by the walls of the first kind – common for the both invariants.
2. A variant of Klein’s formula for the number of real inflection points
Let be a nodal real irreducible algebraic curve. It may have three types of nodes: real nodes with real local branches of , real nodes with imaginary local branches of , or non-real nodes (coming in conjugate pairs). Denote the number of nodes of each type with , , and respectively.
A real flex is a local real branch of with the order of tangency to its tangent line greater than 1 (i.e. the local intersection number is ). The multiplicity of a real flex is . In an affine chart of a flex corresponds to a critical point of the Gauss map. It is easy to see that the multiplicity of a flex equals to the multiplicity of the corresponding critical point. Thus a multiple flex can be thought of as ordinary flexes collected at the same point. We denote with the number of flexes counted with multiplicities.
A solitary real bitangent is a real line which is tangent to at a non-real point (and thus also at the complex conjugate point). The multiplicity of is the sum of the orders over all local branches of tangent to . We denote with the number of solitary real bitangents counted with multiplicities. Clearly, is an even number.
Lemma \lemFlex
(Klein’s formula [1] for nodal curves). For a nodal real irreducible curve of degree in we have
[TABLE]
Demonstration Proof
As in [6], we use additivity of the Euler characteristic to derive Klein’s formula. Let be the normalization. The space of all real lines in is homeomorphic to , and thus has the Euler characteristic 1. For a real line the set consists of distinct points unless is tangent to . Each tangency decreases the size of this set by .
Consider the space , where is a real line. From the observation above we deduce
[TABLE]
Note that and , as each point of lifts to a circle in while . The lemma now follows from the adjunction formula .
Remark 2.2. Lemma 2.1 can be also obtained as an almost immediate consequence from Schuh’s generalization [5] of another Klein’s formula
[TABLE]
(see [6, Thm. 6.D] for a proof via Euler characteristics) combined with the class formula . Here is the dual curve, is its degree, and (resp. and ) are the multiplicity and the number of real local branches of (resp. of ) at .
3. Proof of the main theorem
Let be a smooth irreducible real algebraic link of degree endowed with an orientation . Let be the set of points in such that the projection of from is a nodal curve.
Fix a point . Let where is the linear projection from . Consider the field of tangent planes to passing through , (so-called blackboard framing). Let be the self-linking number with respect to it. We have
[TABLE]
where runs the hyperbolic (i. e., with real local branches) double points of , is the number of them, and is the sign of the crossing at in the sense of knot diagrams. The difference is bounded by one half of the number of those points where the osculating plane passes through . This is the number of real flexes of which we denote by . We have by Lemma 2.1. Thus
[TABLE]
which is Part (a) of Theorem 1.
Now suppose that . Then for any choice of we have the equality sign everywhere in (2), in particular, we have the equality sign in (1), i.e., all crossings are of the same sign, say, positive:
[TABLE]
By Lemma 2.1, the equality sign in the last inequality of (2) implies that all flexes of are ordinary for any choice of . This implies that has non-zero torsion at each point. Indeed, otherwise there exists a real plane which has tangency with of order greater than . It is easy to check that has non-empty intersection with any plane, thus we can choose a point , and then would have a -flex with . Moreover, the positivity of all crossings for any generic projection implies that the torsion is everywhere positive (cf. the proof of [2, Prop. 1]).
Similarly to [2, 3], we derive from these conditions that the real tangent surface (the union of all real lines in tangent to ) is a union of (non-smooth) embedded tori. Indeed, suppose that two tangent lines cross. Let be the plane passing through them (any plane passing through them if they coincide) and let be the line passing through the two tangency points. Let be a generic real point on . Then has two real local branches at the same point such that each of them is either singular or tangent to the line . Since has non-zero torsion, all singular branches of are ordinary cusps. Then we can find a generic point close to such that the projection from it does not satisfy (3).
Let be the connected components of , and let be the connected component of that contains (the union of real lines tangent to ). The same arguments as in [3, Lemma 4.12] show that, for some positive integers , there exist real lines , , , such that (for suitable choice of the orientations) the linking numbers of their real loci and with the components of are:
[TABLE]
Moreover, each splits into two solid tori and such that , , the homology classes and generate and respectively, and we have and . It follows that
[TABLE]
(the linking number of with its small shift disjoint from ). Indeed, if is parametrized by and the torsion is non-zero, then has a cuspidal edge along and a small shift of in the direction of the vector field is disjoint from (see Figure 1). A priori this argument proves (5) up to sign only. However the positivity of the torsion implies that is positive.
\botcaption
Figure 1 \endcaption
If is connected (i. e., ), it remains to note that then the condition implies , hence . Thus satisfies Condition (v) of [3, Thm. 1] which concludes the proof that is an -knot.
If is not necessarily connected, we argue as follows. By Murasugi’s result [4, Prop. 7.5] (see also [3, Prop. 1.2]), the number of crossings of any projection of is at least . Hence, for , we have
[TABLE]
On the other hand, if we choose on a line passing through a pair of complex conjugate points, then has at least one elliptic double point (i. e., a real double point with complex conjugate local branches), whence by the genus formula we obtain
[TABLE]
(the second inequality in (7) is the Harnack’s bound). Hence
[TABLE]
Thus and we conclude that is an -link. This fact follows from [3, Prop. 1.1] (which implies that ) combined with [3, Thm. 2] (which claims, in particular, that is an -link as soon as ). Here we denote with the plane section number of . It is a topological invariant of a link in defined in [3] as the minimal number of intersection points with a generic plane where the minimum is taken over the isotopy class of the link.
Let us show that is a complex orientation of . It is easy to see that the plane section number is at most for any algebraic link of degree . Indeed, it is enough to consider a small shift of a non-osculating tangent plane in a suitable direction. Thus the inequality in is in fact an equality. It follows that the equality is attained in all the inequalities used in the proof, in particular, we have for . Since all components of an -link endowed with a complex orientation are positively linked (see [3]), we are done. This completes the proof of the “only if ” part of (b).
To prove the “if ” part of (b), we notice that by [3, Thm. 3 and §4.4], any -link of degree and genus is a union of knots and , , for some positive integers with . Furthermore, the torsion of is everywhere positive and each knot is arranged on its tangent surface as described above, thus (5) holds for each , and we obtain
[TABLE]
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 11 F. Klein , Ein neue Relation zwischen den Singularitgten einer algebraischen Curve , Math. Ann. 10 ( 1876 ), 199–209 .
- 22 G. B. Mikhalkin, S. Yu. Orevkov , Topology of maximally writhed real algebraic knots , Doklady Math. 97 ( 2018 ), no. 2 , 28–31 . ( Russian \transl English transl. )
- 33 G. Mikhalkin, S. Orevkov , Maximally writhed real algebraic links , Invent. Math. ( to appear \transl arxiv:1710.00013 ).
- 44 K. Murasugi , On the braid index of alternating links , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 326:1 ( 1991 ), 237–260 .
- 55 F. Schuh , An equation of reality for real and imagninary plane curves with higher singularities , Proc. section of sciences of the Royal Academy of Amsterdam 6 ( 1903–1904 ), 764–773 . ( Dutch \transl English transl. )
- 66 O. Ya. Viro , Some integral calculus based on Euler characteristic , in: Topology and Geometry – Rohlin Seminar , Lecture Notes in Math. , vol. 1346 , Springer , 1988 , pp. 127–138 .
- 77 O. Viro , Encomplexing the writhe , in: Topology, Ergodic Theory, Real Algebraic Geometry. Rokhlin’s Memorial , AMS Transl. Ser. 202 , AMS , 2002 , pp. 241–256; arxiv:math.0005162 .
