Some ribbon elements for the quasi-Hopf algebra $D^\omega(H)$
Daniel Bulacu, Florin Panaite

TL;DR
This paper constructs explicit isomorphisms and ribbon elements for the quasi-Hopf algebra $D^omega(H)$, advancing the understanding of its structure and properties in quantum algebra.
Contribution
It provides explicit isomorphisms and new characterizations for ribbon structures in quasi-Hopf algebras, specifically for $D^omega(H)$.
Findings
Explicit isomorphism between $D^omega(H)$ and a quantum double quasi-Hopf algebra
New characterizations for ribbon quasi-Hopf algebras
Construction of ribbon elements for $D^omega(H)$
Abstract
We construct an explicit isomorphism between the quasitriangular quasi-Hopf algebra defined in \cite{bp} and a certain quantum double quasi-Hopf algebra. We give also new characterizations for a quasitriangular quasi-Hopf algebra to be ribbon and use them to construct some ribbon elements for .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Nonlinear Waves and Solitons
Some ribbon elements for the quasi-Hopf algebra
Daniel Bulacu
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bucharest, Str. Academiei 14, RO-010014 Bucharest 1, Romania
and
Florin Panaite
Institute of Mathematics of the Romanian Academy, PO-Box 1-764, RO-014700 Bucharest, Romania
Abstract.
We construct an explicit isomorphism between the quasitriangular quasi-Hopf algebra defined in [6] and a certain quantum double quasi-Hopf algebra. We give also new characterizations for a quasitriangular quasi-Hopf algebra to be ribbon and use them to construct some ribbon elements for .
Key words and phrases:
Quasi-Hopf algebra; twisted quantum double; ribbon element.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
16T05; 18D10
1. Introduction
Dijkgraaf, Pasquier and Roche constructed in [11], from a finite group and a normalized -cocycle on it, the famous quasi-Hopf algebra (called the twisted quantum double of ). The importance of this construction stems from the fact that the irreducible representations of allow to recover the fusion rules, the matrix and the conformal weights of a certain Rational Conformal Field Theory described in [12]. On the other hand, ribbon (quasi-) quantum groups give rise to topological invariant of knots and links: following the constructions of Reshetikhin and Turaev [23, 24], for such an algebra one can define regular isotopy invariants of coloured ribbon graphs, the colours being finite-dimensional representations. This result was applied to the ribbon quasi-Hopf algebra in [1] by considering surgery on the ribbon graphs coloured by a representation of , leading thus to a -manifold invariant.
In [6] we generalized the construction of to an arbitrary finite-dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebra and a normalized 3-cocycle in the cohomology of commutative algebras over cocommutative Hopf algebras introduced by Sweedler in [26]. We denoted this new quasi-Hopf algebra by and showed that is always a quasitriangular (QT for short) quasi-Hopf algebra. We expected to always be ribbon, as is, but we were able to provide a ribbon element for it only if an extra condition is satisfied; see [6, Proposition 3.3]. The goal of this paper is to overcome this problem and to explain the meaning of the extra condition required in [6]. Towards this end, we identify with the quantum double (in the sense of Hausser and Nill [14, 15]) of , the finite-dimensional quasi-Hopf algebra introduced in [21]; see Theorem 4.2. This gives us for free the QT quasi-Hopf algebra structure of as well as the modular elements of in terms of the modular elements of . The latter occur in the computation of the ribbon elements for , owing to Theorem 3.1 and its Corollary 3.3 below, and the fact that is unimodular. It then comes out (see Theorem 5.3) that to any square root in of the modular element we can associate a ribbon element for , where stands for the group of grouplike elements of , that is algebra maps from to . Situations when such an element exists are uncovered at the end of Section 5, for instance when has odd dimension or is of odd order, or when the characteristic of does not divide the dimension of (and consequently when has characteristic zero). Example 5.6 says that the extra condition in [6, Proposition 3.3] that guarantees a ribbon element for is satisfied if and only if is unimodular. As the Hopf group algebra is always unimodular, this explains why for the quasi-Hopf algebra one can always construct a ribbon element. We should also mention here that our approach provides new ribbon elements even for some of the quasi-Hopf algebras , and thus new -manifold invariants as in [1].
2. Preliminaries
We present, briefly, the definition an the basic properties of a (quasitriangular) quasi-Hopf algebra. For more information we refer to [13] or [18], [19]. We work over a field . All algebras, linear spaces, etc. will be over ; unadorned means .
A quasi-bialgebra is a -tuple , where is an associative algebra with unit , is an invertible element in , and and are algebra homomorphisms such that is coassociative up to conjugation by and is counit for ; furthermore, is a normalized -cocycle.
In what follows we denote , for all , the tensor components of by capital letters and the ones of by lower case letters.
is called a quasi-Hopf algebra if, moreover, there exists an anti-morphism of the algebra and elements such that, for all , we have:
[TABLE]
A quasi-Hopf algebra with and is an ordinary Hopf algebra.
For a quasi-Hopf algebra we introduce the following elements in :
[TABLE]
Note that our definition of a quasi-Hopf algebra is different from the one given by Drinfeld [13] in the sense that we do not require the antipode to be bijective. Anyway, the bijectivity of the antipode will be implicitly understood in the case when , the inverse of , appears is formulas or computations. According to [3], is always bijective, provided that is finite dimensional.
The antipode of a Hopf algebra is an anti-morphism of coalgebras. For a quasi-Hopf algebra there is an invertible element , called the Drinfeld twist, such that and , for all , where .
For a quasi-bialgebra, the category of left -modules is monoidal (see [18, Chapter XV] for the definition of a monoidal category). The tensor product is defined by endowed with the -module structure given by and unit object , considered as an -module via ; the associativity constraint is determined by and the left and right unit constraints are given by the canonoical isomorphisms in the category of -vector spaces.
A quasi-bialgebra is called quasitriangular (QT for short) if, moreover, the category is braided in the sense of [18, Definition XIII.1.1]. This is equivalent to the existence of an invertible element (formal notation, summation implicitly understood), called -matrix, satisfying certain conditions. Record that any -matrix obeys
[TABLE]
When we refer to a QT quasi-bialgebra or quasi-Hopf algebra we always indicate the -matrix that produces the QT structure by pointing out the couple .
For a QT quasi-Hopf algebra, is the element of defined by
[TABLE]
By [5], is an invertible element of and the following equalities hold ():
[TABLE]
3. Ribbon quasi-Hopf algebras
The definition of a ribbon quasi-Hopf algebra is designed in such a way that the category of finite-dimensional left -modules is a ribbon category as in [18, Definition XIV.3.2]. More exactly, by [7] a QT quasi-Hopf algebra is ribbon if there exists an invertible central element such that
[TABLE]
We can provide the following characterization for ribbon quasi-Hopf algebras. Note that (3.10) below was proved for the first time in [7, Proposition 5.5] under the condition invertible; that it works in general was proved in [25, Section 2.3]. In what follows we present an easy proof of this, based mostly on the arguments used in [7].
Theorem 3.1**.**
A QT quasi-Hopf algebra is ribbon if and only if there exists a central element (called ribbon element) such that the conditions in (3.9) hold and
[TABLE]
where, as before, is the element defined in (2.5).
Proof.
Suppose that is ribbon and let be an invertible central element such that the conditions in (3.9) are satisfied. To prove that (3.10) is satisfied as well, observe first that by applying to both sides of the first equality in (3.9) we get ; see (2.4). Denote and restate the first equality in (3.9) as . Thus, by this equality and the fact that is a central element in we deduce that
[TABLE]
This fact allows to compute, for all :
[TABLE]
In particular, by taking , by (2.2) we conclude that , and therefore , as needed. Note that is a central element of .
Conversely, let be a central element of such that the relations in (3.9) and (3.10) are fulfilled. Then is invertible because so is , and therefore is an invertible central element of . It follows now that is a ribbon quasi-Hopf algebra. ∎
It is a well established result that ribbon categories are pivotal (or, equivalently, sovereign) braided categories satisfying a certain condition related to some canonical twists; see [17, Proposition A.4]. In the case when the category is , with a ribbon quasi-Hopf algebra as in Theorem 3.1, this result is encoded in [6, Theorem 3.5]. It asserts that defines a one to one correspondence between and central invertible elements satisfying (3.9) and (3.10), i.e. ribbon elements of . Here
[TABLE]
Due to the proof of [10, Proposition 3.12], the conditions invertible and in the definition of an element are redundant, provided that , for all . Otherwise stated, we have the following.
Corollary 3.2**.**
Let be a QT quasi-Hopf algebra and the element defined in (2.5). Then defines a one to one correspondence between
[TABLE]
and ribbon structures on as in Theorem 3.1.
We end this section by pointing out that in the finite-dimensional case the element can be computed in terms of the modular elements and , and the -matrix of (we refer to [16] for the definitions of and ). Namely, by the formula (6.21) in [9] we have
[TABLE]
where is the inverse of in and is the element defined in (2.3).
Corollary 3.3**.**
If is a finite-dimensional unimodular QT quasi-Hopf algebra and is as in (2.5) then defines a one to one correspondence between
[TABLE]
and ribbon elements of , where is the modular element of .
Proof.
When is unimodular, i.e. , the formula in (3.11) gives the equality . As and this implies
[TABLE]
By using the bijectivity of , we obtain that , and so . Now everything follows from Corollary 3.2. ∎
4. The quasi-Hopf algebras and
Let be a cocommutative Hopf algebra with antipode S over a base field . As is cocommutative, we can introduce a simplified version of Sweedler’s sigma notation: for , we denote
[TABLE]
and so on. With this notation, the antipode and counit axioms read:
[TABLE]
We recall some facts concerning Hopf crossed products and cohomology (see [26]). Let be a cocommutative Hopf algebra and a commutative left -module algebra, with -action denoted by , . Assume that we are given a linear map , which is normalized (that is, for all ) and convolution invertible. Suppose that, moreover, satisfies the 2-cocycle condition:
[TABLE]
Then, if we define a multiplication on by (for and we write in place of in order to distinguish this structure), this multiplication is associative and is a unit. We denote with this algebra structure by and called it the Hopf crossed product of and .
From now on, for the rest of this section, we assume that is a finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebra. Thus, is a commutative Hopf algebra with unit , counit , multiplication , comultiplication if and only if , and antipode , where are arbitrary as well as .
Assume that we are given a -linear map that is convolution invertible and satisfies the conditions:
[TABLE]
Note that such a map is noting but a normalized 3-cocycle in the Sweedler cohomology of with coefficients in , as defined in [26].
Since is finite dimensional, we can identify with , so we can regard ; we denote and its convolution inverse .
We define the element by . Since is a commutative algebra, is a quasi-bialgebra, where and are the ones that give the usual coalgebra structure of (dual to the algebra structure of ). Moreover, if we define by the formula , then is a quasi-Hopf algebra, which will be denoted by , see [21].
We can consider the diagonal crossed product as in [8, 14]. On the other hand, we will construct a certain Hopf crossed product as follows, see [6].
We introduce first the following notation: , for all . Next, we define the linear map , by
[TABLE]
for all , where is the convolution inverse of .
It is easy to see that is also normalized and convolution invertible. By [6], we have
[TABLE]
Since is cocommutative, becomes a commutative left module algebra, with action , , where , where we denoted by and the left and right regular actions of on given by and for all and . Hence, for all and .
Define now the linear map by . Since is normalized and convolution invertible, is also normalized and convolution invertible, and the relation (4.5) is equivalent to the fact that is a 2-cocycle, that is (4.1) holds if we replace the action by . Hence, we can consider the Hopf crossed product , denoted by , which is an associative algebra with unit . Its multiplication is given, for all , , by
[TABLE]
Theorem 4.1**.**
The linear map defined by
[TABLE]
is an algebra isomorphism, with inverse given by
[TABLE]
where we denoted by the element for given by (2.3) and by and the regular actions of on and of on .
Proof.
We will construct the map by using the Universal Property of the diagonal crossed product ([2, Proposition 8.2]). We define the linear maps
[TABLE]
One can easily see that is an algebra map and the relations (8.2) and (8.4) in [2, Proposition 8.2] are satisfied, that is we have
[TABLE]
So the only thing left to prove is the relation (8.3) in [2, Proposition 8.2], namely
[TABLE]
where we denoted by another copy of . We compute:
[TABLE]
When we evaluate this in we obtain:
[TABLE]
Thus, Proposition 8.2 from [2] yields an algebra map , defined by
[TABLE]
where is the element for given by (2.3). An easy computation shows that this map is identical to the one given by (4.7).
To prove that is bijective with inverse , since the underlying vector spaces have the same (finite) dimension, it is enough to prove that . We compute:
[TABLE]
When we evaluate this in we obtain:
[TABLE]
To finish the proof it will be enough to prove that
[TABLE]
The 3-cocycle condition for applied to the elements , , , yields
[TABLE]
So it is enough to prove that
[TABLE]
But this relation follows immediately by applying the 3-cocycle condition for to the elements , , , . ∎
The quantum double of the quasi-Hopf algebra has as underlying algebra structure the diagonal crossed product , so Theorem 4.1 implies:
Theorem 4.2**.**
* is a QT quasi-Hopf algebra.*
It turns out that the QT quasi-Hopf algebra structure otained on by transferring the structure from via the isomorphism (4.7) coincides with the one introduced in [6]. Namely:
the reassociator: .
the comultiplication: define the linear map by
[TABLE]
for all . Then define the linear map , . Identifying with , we will write, for any , . Then the comultiplication of is defined, for all , , by
[TABLE]
the counit: , , for all , .
the antipode: , and given by
[TABLE]
for all , , where we denoted by the convolution inverse of , with notation .
the -matrix:
[TABLE]
where are dual bases in and .
Moreover, by [6], is convolution invertible with inverse and we have the relation:
[TABLE]
Let now be a finite group, with multiplication denoted by juxtaposition and unit denoted by . Let be a normalized 3-cocycle on , i.e. is a map such that for all , and whenever , or is equal to . We can take , the group algebra of , which is a finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebra, and extend by linearity to a map , which turns out to be a Sweedler 3-cocycle on . So, we can consider the QT quasi-Hopf algebra , which will be denoted by . This QT quasi-Hopf algebra structure of was introduced in [11].
5. Some ribbon elements for and
Let be a finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebra, a normalized -cocycle on and the quasi-Hopf algebra constructed in Section 4. So is a QT quasi-Hopf algebra isomorphic to the quantum double .
In what follows, in order to avoid any confusion, we denote by and the modular elements of as a Hopf algebra. Similar notation, and , is used for the modular elements of the quasi-Hopf algebra . As is cocommutative it follows that , i.e. and are unimodular as Hopf and respectively quasi-Hopf algebras. Also, it is clear that a left (and at the same time right) integral in the quasi-Hopf algebra is nothing but a left (and at the same time right) integral on the Hopf algebra , i.e. an element obeying , for all . Finally, will always denote a finite dimensional quasi-Hopf algebra and a finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebra.
In this section we show that the element is a ribbon element for , provided that is an algebra map such that ; here, as before, is the element in (2.5) corresponding to and the other notation is as in Section 4. Note that when in or is unimodular we can take , and therefore is ribbon with ribbon element . This applies for instance to a finite dimensional Hopf group algebra , and so is always a ribbon quasi-Hopf algebra.
To this end, we start by describing the space of left cointegrals on . By the comments made after the proof of [4, Theorem 3.7] we have that a non-zero left cointegral on a quasi-Hopf algebra for which are invertible elements is a non-zero morphism satisfying , for any left integral in (in [4] the assumption invertible is omitted and in place of appears ; we correct these facts now).
Lemma 5.1**.**
Let be a non-zero left integral in , i.e. , for all . Then is a non-zero left cointegral for .
Proof.
For the quasi-Hopf algebra the elements are invertible, so a non-zero left cointegral on is a non-zero element satisfying , for all .
It is well known that for any non-zero left integral in the map is bijective (result valid for any finite-dimensional Hopf algebra, not necessarily cocommutative). Thus we find a unique element such that ; in particular, . We have, for all , that , which is equivalent to , which in turn is equivalent to .
As , it follows that , which implies . Therefore, by rescaling, we can assume without loss of generality that , as stated.
Conversely, is a left cointegral on since
[TABLE]
and this is equal to because
[TABLE]
So our proof ends. ∎
For a finite-dimensional quasi-Hopf algebra the modular element is defined by , where is a left cointegral, is a left integral such that and and are the elements defined in (2.3).
Corollary 5.2**.**
We have that . Consequently, the modular element of the quantum double equals .
Proof.
Recall that is defined by , for all and a non-zero left integral. Also, since is unimodular we have . Thus, by specializing the above definition of to we compute, for all , that
[TABLE]
But the pair obeys or, equivalently, . The latter is equivalent to , and so , as desired.
Finally, we have , hence the formula in [4, Proposition 5.9] yields
[TABLE]
since with and , and together with this implies . ∎
The computation performed before [6, Proposition 3.3] ensures that the distinguished element satisfies
[TABLE]
where is the Drinfeld twist. Consequently, the same relation is satisfied by any element of the form , provided that is an algebra map.
We have now all the necessary ingredients in order to prove the following:
Theorem 5.3**.**
Let be a finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebra , a normalized -cocycle on and an algebra map. Then the element is ribbon if and only if .
Proof.
The quasi-Hopf algebra is unimodular; this follows from Theorem 4.1 and [9, Theorem 6.5]. Furthermore, by Corollary 5.2 and the definition of the isomorphism in (4.7) we can see that the modular element of is
[TABLE]
So, according to Corollary 3.3, it suffices to see when satisfies the relations
[TABLE]
It can be easily checked that (5.2) is equivalent to , and the latter is equivalent to , because is commutative and is convolution invertible. Also, the comments made after (5.1) guarantees that (5.3) is always satisfied.
We look at (5.4). By (4.11) we have that (5.4) is equivalent to , for all . The last equation becomes , and it holds for any since is an algebra map and is commutative. ∎
We end this section with some concrete examples. In what follows by we denote the set of grouplike elements of , assuming, as before, that is a finite-dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebra. is a group under convolution, and so the group Hopf algebra is a Hopf subalgebra of . By the freeness theorem proved in [20] it follows that divides .
Example 5.4**.**
If has odd order in then is a ribbon quasi-Hopf algebra.
Proof.
If has order in then is an algebra map such that . By Theorem 5.3 we obtain that is a ribbon element for . ∎
Example 5.5**.**
Suppose that either or is an odd number. Then is a ribbon quasi-Hopf algebra.
Proof.
Since divides , in either case we get that has odd order, and so Example 5.4 applies. ∎
The next example shows that the condition in [6, Proposition 3.3] is equivalent to the unimodularity of .
Example 5.6**.**
The element is a ribbon element for if and only if is unimodular.
Proof.
Take in Theorem 5.3; we obtain that is a ribbon element if and only if , i.e. is unimodular. ∎
The next example refers precisely to the ribbon structure on defined by (5.18) in [1].
Example 5.7**.**
The quasi-Hopf algebra is ribbon.
Proof.
We have and is unimodular. Indeed, is a left and right integral in . ∎
Example 5.8**.**
Suppose that in (this happens for instance when is of characteristic zero). Then is a ribbon element for .
Proof.
Since , by the trace formula proved in [22, Proposition 2 (c)] we get that is semisimple, and so unimodular, too. Hence is a ribbon element for . ∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] D. Altschuler, A. Coste: Quasi-quantum groups, knots, three manifolds and topological field theory , Comm. Math. Phys. 150 (1992), 83–107.
- 2[2] H. Albuquerque, F. Panaite, On quasi-Hopf smash products and twisted tensor products of quasialgebras , Algebr. Represent. Theory 12 (2009), 199–234.
- 3[3] D. Bulacu, S. Caenepeel: Integrals for (dual) quasi-Hopf algebras. Applications , J. Algebra 266 (2003), 552–583.
- 4[4] D. Bulacu, S. Caenepeel: On integrals and cointegrals for quasi-Hopf algebras , J. Algebra 351 (2012), 390–425.
- 5[5] D. Bulacu, E. Nauwelaerts: Quasitriangular and ribbon quasi-Hopf algebras , Comm. Algebra 31 (2003), 657–672.
- 6[6] D. Bulacu, F. Panaite: A generalization of the quasi-Hopf algebra D ω ( G ) superscript 𝐷 𝜔 𝐺 D^{\omega}(G) , Comm. Algebra 26 (1998), 4125–4141.
- 7[7] D. Bulacu, F. Panaite, F. Van Oystaeyen: Quantum traces and quantum dimensions for quasi-Hopf algebras , Comm. Algebra 27 (1999), 6103–6122.
- 8[8] D. Bulacu, F. Panaite, F. Van Oystaeyen: Generalized diagonal crossed products and smash products for quasi-Hopf algebras. Applications , Comm. Math. Phys. 266 , 355–399 (2006).
