Effect of Geometry on Sensitivity and Offset of AlGaN/GaN and InAlN/GaN Hall-effect Sensors
Hannah S. Alpert, Karen M. Dowling, Caitlin A. Chapin, Ananth Saran, Yalamarthy, Savannah R. Benbrook, Helmut K\"ock, Udo Ausserlechner, and, Debbie G. Senesky

TL;DR
This study investigates how the geometry of AlGaN/GaN and InAlN/GaN Hall-effect sensors influences their sensitivity and offset, showing that contact shape and device biasing significantly affect performance.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of how contact length and device shape impact sensitivity and offset, offering design guidelines for optimizing GaN Hall-effect sensors.
Findings
Point-like contacts yield highest current-scaled sensitivity.
Equal-length contacts optimize voltage-scaled sensitivity.
All devices maintain low offset (<20 μT) at low currents.
Abstract
The current- and voltage-scaled sensitivities and signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) (with respect to thermal noise) of various octagonal AlGaN/GaN and InAlN/GaN Hall-effect sensors were examined in this work. The effect of metal contact lengths on sensitivity and sensor offset was evaluated. Calculations that take into account the shape of the device show that devices with point-like contacts have the highest current-scaled sensitivity (68.9 V/A/T), while devices with contacts of equal length to their non-contact sides have the highest voltage-scaled sensitivity (86.9 mV/V/T). The sensitivities of the two other devices follow the predicted trends closely. All the devices have offsets less than 20 T at low supply current operation (< 300 A) and most remain below 35 T at higher supply current (up to 1.2 mA). The consistent low offsets across the devices imply that the choice of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
