So, what is a derived functor?
V. Hinich

TL;DR
This paper redefines derived functors within infinity categories using correspondences, clarifying the transition from adjoint pairs to derived adjoint pairs and emphasizing the naturality of this process.
Contribution
It introduces a correspondence-based framework for derived functors in infinity categories, simplifying the understanding of derived adjoint pairs and their canonicity.
Findings
Comparison with Deligne's definition (SGA4) included
Diagrams of derived functors discussed in detail
Kan extensions described via correspondences
Abstract
In the context of infinity categories, we rethink the notion of derived functor in terms of correspondences. This is especially convenient for the description of a passage from an adjoint pair (F,G) of functors to a derived adjoint pair (LF,RG). In particular, canonicity of this passage becomes obvious. 2nd version: added comparison to Deligne's definition (SGA4) and a discussion of diagrams of derived functors. Introduction rewritten and references added. 3rd version: description of Kan extensions in terms of correspondences more detailed. 4th version: the final version accepted to HHA.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Topics in Algebra
