Amalgamation and Keisler's Order
Danielle Ulrich

TL;DR
This paper refines the understanding of Keisler's order by improving ultrafilter constructions and establishing new bounds, demonstrating that certain theories are not comparable within the order, especially for low theories and hypergraph theories.
Contribution
It provides uniform ultrafilter constructions and sharper bounds, extending the separation results in Keisler's order for a broader class of theories.
Findings
Sharper bounds for Keisler's order classes.
Separation of hypergraph theories in Keisler's order.
Application to low theories and independent amalgamation.
Abstract
Malliaris and Shelah famously proved that Keisler's order has infinitely many classes. In more detail, for each , let be the theory of the random -ary -clique free hypergraph. Malliaris and Shelah show that whenever , then . However, their arguments do not separate from , and the model-theoretic properties detected by their ultrafilters are difficult to evaluate in practice. We uniformize the relevant ultrafilter constructions and obtain sharper model-theoretic bounds. As a sample application, we prove the following: suppose , and is a countable low theory. Suppose that every independent system of countable models of can be independently amalgamated. Then . In…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistorical Economic and Social Studies · Political and Social Issues · Political Economy and Marxism
