WURBench: Toward Benchmarking Wake-up Radio-based Systems
Rajeev Piyare, Amy L. Murphy

TL;DR
This paper proposes a benchmarking framework for wake-up radio systems to standardize performance evaluation, enabling consistent, repeatable, and comparable assessments of diverse WUR-based technologies.
Contribution
It introduces an evaluation framework and benchmark for wake-up radio systems, addressing the lack of standardization in performance measurement methods.
Findings
Developed a comprehensive benchmarking methodology
Facilitated consistent comparison of different WUR systems
Enabled more reliable performance evaluation
Abstract
The performance of wake-up radios must be clearly measured and understood while designing and developing robust, dependable, and affordable systems, considering both benefits and shortcomings. State-of-the-art WURs display significant diversity in their architecture, processing capability, energy consumption, and receiver sensitivity. Standard methodologies for benchmarking are crucial for quantitatively evaluating the performance of this emerging technology, however, currently, no accepted standard for such quantitative measurement exists. Further, there is no consensus on what objective evaluation procedures and metrics should be used to understand the performance of whole systems exploiting this technology. This lack of standardization has prevented researchers from comparing results and leveraging previous work that could otherwise avoid duplication and speed up the validation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks · Wireless Networks and Protocols · Bluetooth and Wireless Communication Technologies
