Credibility of Automatic Appraisal of Domain Names
Karol Kr\'ol, Artur Strzelecki, Dariusz Zdonek

TL;DR
This paper investigates the reliability of automated web applications for valuing domain names, revealing that they often focus on website parameters and traffic rather than true domain valuation.
Contribution
It critically assesses existing domain appraisal tools, highlighting their limitations and the misalignment between their design purpose and actual valuation of domain names.
Findings
Appraisal tools often consider website parameters, not domain-specific factors.
Many tools aim to capture online traffic rather than provide accurate domain value.
Applications frequently track users for advertising, not domain appraisal.
Abstract
Both domain names and entire websites are increasingly frequently treated as assets, the value of which can be appraised. The objective of the present thesis was to verify the credibility of domain name appraisals obtained using generally available web applications in an automated, algorithmic way. In conclusions section, it was mentioned that the terms domain name appraisal and website appraisal are frequently equated. It was also shown that algorithms used in the tested applications consider parameters characterising websites. Thus, they cannot be used to verify the value of domain names themselves. Moreover, during the analysis of the pattern of operation of the appraisal websites it was noticed that they were not made available with domain name or website appraisals in mind. Their objective was to acquire and intercept online traffic. Such applications also left cookie files on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIntellectual Property Rights and Media · Marketing and Advertising Strategies
