Bias and Generalization in Deep Generative Models: An Empirical Study
Shengjia Zhao, Hongyu Ren, Arianna Yuan, Jiaming Song and, Noah Goodman, Stefano Ermon

TL;DR
This paper systematically investigates the inductive bias and generalization capabilities of deep generative models for images, revealing insights into their ability to generate novel attributes and their similarities to human cognition.
Contribution
It introduces a new framework inspired by cognitive psychology to analyze bias and generalization in deep generative models, providing empirical insights into their behavior.
Findings
Models exhibit biases similar to human psychology.
Patterns of attribute generation are consistent across architectures.
The framework reveals when and how models generate novel features.
Abstract
In high dimensional settings, density estimation algorithms rely crucially on their inductive bias. Despite recent empirical success, the inductive bias of deep generative models is not well understood. In this paper we propose a framework to systematically investigate bias and generalization in deep generative models of images. Inspired by experimental methods from cognitive psychology, we probe each learning algorithm with carefully designed training datasets to characterize when and how existing models generate novel attributes and their combinations. We identify similarities to human psychology and verify that these patterns are consistent across commonly used models and architectures.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
