Carving model-free inference
Snigdha Panigrahi

TL;DR
This paper extends the theoretical foundation of carving, a method for valid selective inference that reuses pilot data, to model-free settings, demonstrating its effectiveness through simulations and real data.
Contribution
It develops asymptotic theory to justify carving beyond Gaussian models, enabling broader application in model-free inference.
Findings
Carving produces valid confidence intervals in model-free settings.
Carving yields tighter intervals compared to traditional methods.
The method is effective in both simulated and real data scenarios.
Abstract
Complex studies involve many steps. Selecting promising findings based on pilot data is a first step. As more observations are collected, the investigator must decide how to combine the new data with the pilot data to construct valid selective inference. Carving, introduced by Fithian et al. (2014), enables the reuse of pilot data during selective inference and accounts for over-optimism from the selection process. Currently, the justification for carving is tied to parametric models, like the commonly used Gaussian model. In this paper, we develop the asymptotic theory to substantiate the use of carving beyond Gaussian models. Through both simulated and real instances, we find that carving produces valid and tight confidence intervals within a model-free setting.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference · Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
