The Responsibility Quantification (ResQu) Model of Human Interaction with Automation
Nir Douer, Joachim Meyer

TL;DR
This paper introduces the ResQu model, using Information Theory to quantify human responsibility in autonomous systems, revealing that human causal responsibility is often low even with major involvement.
Contribution
It presents a novel responsibility quantification model based on Information Theory to assess human involvement in intelligent automation systems.
Findings
Human responsibility is often low despite major involvement.
Current policies of human in the loop are misleading.
The model aids in analyzing system design and policy decisions.
Abstract
Intelligent systems and advanced automation are involved in information collection and evaluation, in decision-making and in the implementation of chosen actions. In such systems, human responsibility becomes equivocal. Understanding human casual responsibility is particularly important when intelligent autonomous systems can harm people, as with autonomous vehicles or, most notably, with autonomous weapon systems (AWS). Using Information Theory, we develop a responsibility quantification (ResQu) model of human involvement in intelligent automated systems and demonstrate its applications on decisions regarding AWS. The analysis reveals that human comparative responsibility to outcomes is often low, even when major functions are allocated to the human. Thus, broadly stated policies of keeping humans in the loop and having meaningful human control are misleading and cannot truly direct…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
