TL;DR
This paper evaluates the effectiveness of rain removal algorithms in traffic surveillance videos, showing that while some improve segmentation, they often do not enhance feature tracking, highlighting the need for real-world testing.
Contribution
It introduces a new dataset and evaluation protocol for assessing rain removal algorithms in real traffic videos, bridging the gap between synthetic testing and real-world application.
Findings
Single-frame rain removal improves segmentation by 19.7%.
Video-based rain removal enhances feature tracking by 7.72%.
Rain removal algorithms show mixed results on instance segmentation.
Abstract
Varying weather conditions, including rainfall and snowfall, are generally regarded as a challenge for computer vision algorithms. One proposed solution to the challenges induced by rain and snowfall is to artificially remove the rain from images or video using rain removal algorithms. It is the promise of these algorithms that the rain-removed image frames will improve the performance of subsequent segmentation and tracking algorithms. However, rain removal algorithms are typically evaluated on their ability to remove synthetic rain on a small subset of images. Currently, their behavior is unknown on real-world videos when integrated with a typical computer vision pipeline. In this paper, we review the existing rain removal algorithms and propose a new dataset that consists of 22 traffic surveillance sequences under a broad variety of weather conditions that all include either rain or…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
