Temporal clustering of rotational glitches in the Crab pulsar
Julian Brian Carlin, Andrew Melatos, Damjan Vukcevic

TL;DR
This study investigates the timing of glitches in the Crab pulsar over 36 years, finding evidence of clustering and rate changes, which suggest non-random glitch activity potentially linked to underlying physical mechanisms.
Contribution
It introduces models with rate changes to better describe glitch timing, challenging the assumption of a constant glitch rate in pulsar studies.
Findings
Evidence of glitch clustering at 2σ level
Models with rate changes outperform homogeneous Poisson process
Implications for understanding glitch trigger mechanisms
Abstract
It is an open question whether glitch activity in individual pulsars varies on decadal time-scales. The Crab pulsar has experienced 23 spin-up glitches in the last 36 years, interrupting an otherwise monotonic deceleration. A homogeneous Poisson process, i.e. a process with constant rate, is not sufficient to describe the time-ordered distribution of glitch epochs in the Crab pulsar. There are signs of clustering at the level when testing with Ripley's function. Two alternative, inhomogeneous models with one and two step-wise rate changes are found to have higher relative evidence (Bayes factors of 1.74 and 2.86 respectively) than the homogeneous Poisson process. The distinction between clustering, where events are correlated, and rate variation is discussed. The implications for glitch microphysics, in particular trigger mechanisms based on avalanche processes, are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
