The Impact of Photometric Redshift Errors on Lensing Statistics in Ray-Tracing Simulations
Matthew W. Abruzzo, Zolt\'an Haiman

TL;DR
This study assesses how photometric redshift errors impact weak lensing cosmological constraints using ray-tracing simulations, highlighting the importance of accurate photo-z modeling for future surveys like LSST.
Contribution
It provides a quantitative analysis of photo-z error effects on lensing statistics and establishes survey size thresholds for acceptable parameter bias levels.
Findings
Power spectrum more resilient to photo-z errors than lensing peaks.
Residual photo-z bias of |dz| < 0.003(1+z) is acceptable for surveys smaller than ~1300 sq. deg.
Simplistic photo-z PDF approximations can significantly degrade constraints even in small surveys.
Abstract
Weak lensing surveys are reaching sensitivities at which uncertainties in the galaxy redshift distributions n(z) from photo-z errors degrade cosmological constraints. We use ray-tracing simulations and a simple treatment of photo-z errors to assess cosmological parameter biases from uncertainties in n(z) in an LSST-like survey. We use the power spectrum and the abundance of lensing peaks to infer cosmological parameters, and find that the former is somewhat more resilient to photo-z errors. We place conservative lower limits on the survey size at which different types of photo-z errors degrade LCDM (wCDM) parameter constraints by 50%. A residual constant photo-z bias of |dz| < 0.003(1+z), satisfying the current LSST requirement, does not significantly degrade constraints for surveys smaller than ~1300 (~490) square degrees using lensing peaks and ~6500 (~4900) square degrees using the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
