Average Convergence Rate of Evolutionary Algorithms II: Continuous Optimization
Yu Chen, Jun He

TL;DR
This paper provides a theoretical analysis of the average convergence rate (ACR) in continuous optimization, classifying ACR behaviors and relating them to mutation strategies and problem difficulty, with implications for evolutionary algorithm performance.
Contribution
It introduces a theoretical framework for classifying ACR into linear/sublinear and polynomial/exponential categories, linking these to mutation types and problem complexity.
Findings
ACR is linear with positive limit inferior for positive landscape-adaptive mutation.
ACR is sublinear for landscape-invariant or zero landscape-adaptive mutation.
Easy problems exhibit polynomial ACR, while hard problems show exponential ACR.
Abstract
The average convergence rate (ACR) measures how fast the approximation error of an evolutionary algorithm converges to zero per generation. It is defined as the geometric average of the reduction rate of the approximation error over consecutive generations. This paper makes a theoretical analysis of the ACR in continuous optimization. The obtained results are summarized as follows. According to the limit property, the ACR is classified into two categories: (1) linear ACR whose limit inferior value is larger than a positive and (2) sublinear ACR whose value converges to zero. Then, it is proven that the ACR is linear for evolutionary programming using positive landscape-adaptive mutation, but sublinear for that using landscape-invariant or zero landscape-adaptive mutation. The relationship between the ACR and the decision space dimension is also classified into two categories: (1)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
