Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection
Jaros{\l}aw W\k{a}tr\'obski, Jaros{\l}aw Jankowski, Pawe{\l} Ziemba,, Artur Karczmarczyk, Magdalena Zio{\l}o

TL;DR
This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for selecting suitable Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods tailored to specific decision problems, enhancing consistency and decision quality across various fields.
Contribution
It develops a hierarchical set of MCDA method characteristics, rules, and a decision support framework, including a web platform, for improved method selection in decision-making.
Findings
Framework aligns with expert choices in reference cases.
Supports decision-making even with incomplete data.
Available as a public web platform.
Abstract
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods are widely used in various fields and disciplines. While most of the research has been focused on the development and improvement of new MCDA methods, relatively limited attention has been paid to their appropriate selection for the given decision problem. Their improper application decreases the quality of recommendations, as different MCDA methods deliver inconsistent results. The current paper presents a methodological and practical framework for selecting suitable MCDA methods for a particular decision situation. A set of 56 available MCDA methods was analyzed and, based on that, a hierarchical set of methods characteristics and the rule base were obtained. This analysis, rules and modelling of the uncertainty in the decision problem description allowed to build a framework supporting the selection of a MCDA method for a given…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
