On the tree cover number and the positive semidefinite maximum nullity of a graph
Chassidy Bozeman

TL;DR
This paper investigates the relationship between the tree cover number and the maximum positive semidefinite nullity of graphs, proving conjectures and establishing bounds for outerplanar graphs.
Contribution
It proves the conjecture that the tree cover number is less than or equal to the maximum positive semidefinite nullity for certain graph families and provides bounds for outerplanar graphs.
Findings
For connected outerplanar graphs, T(G) = M_+(G) ≤ ⌈n/2⌉.
For outerplanar graphs with no 3- or 4-cycle, T(G) = M_+(G) ≤ n/3.
Characterization of outerplanar graphs with T(G) = M_+(G) = ⌈n/2⌉.
Abstract
For a simple graph let denote the set of real positive semidefinite matrices such that if and if . The maximum positive semidefinite nullity of , denoted is A tree cover of is a collection of vertex-disjoint simple trees occurring as induced subgraphs of that cover all the vertices of . The tree cover number of , denoted , is the cardinality of a minimum tree cover. It is known that the tree cover number of a graph and the maximum positive semidefinite nullity of a graph are equal for outerplanar graphs, and it was conjectured in 2011 that for all graphs [Barioli et al., Minimum semidefinite rank of outerplanar graphs and the tree cover number, …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGraph theory and applications · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems
