Distance distributions and inverse problems for metric measure spaces
Facundo M\'emoli, Tom Needham

TL;DR
This paper develops a formal framework to evaluate how well distance distributions distinguish between different metric measure spaces, addressing their discriminative power and inverse problems across various categories.
Contribution
It introduces a rigorous approach to assess the discriminative ability of distance distributions and solves inverse problems in multiple categories of metric measure spaces.
Findings
Counterexample to the Curve Histogram Conjecture
Sphere rigidity results for Riemannian manifolds
Local injectivity in metric graphs
Abstract
Applications in data science, shape analysis and object classification frequently require comparison of probability distributions defined on different ambient spaces. To accomplish this, one requires a notion of distance on a given class of metric measure spaces -- that is, compact metric spaces endowed with probability measures. Such distances are typically defined as comparisons between metric measure space invariants, such as distance distributions (also referred to as shape distributions, distance histograms or shape contexts in the literature). Generally, distances defined in terms of distance distributions are actually pseudometrics, in that they may vanish when comparing nonisomorphic spaces. The goal of this paper is to set up a formal framework for assessing the discrimininative power of distance distributions, i.e., the extend to which these pseudometrics fail to define proper…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
