Working in Pairs: Understanding the Effects of Worker Interactions in Crowdwork
Chien-Ju Ho, Ming Yin

TL;DR
This paper investigates how peer communication between workers in crowdsourcing tasks influences work quality, finding significant improvements in task accuracy but limited impact on future independent performance.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of peer communication in crowdsourcing, demonstrating its effects on various task types and providing experimental evidence of its benefits.
Findings
Peer communication significantly improves work quality.
Limited effect on future independent performance.
Effective across multiple task types.
Abstract
Crowdsourcing has gained popularity as a tool to harness human brain power to help solve problems that are difficult for computers. Previous work in crowdsourcing often assumes that workers complete crowdwork independently. In this paper, we relax the independent property of crowdwork and explore how introducing direct, synchronous, and free-style interactions between workers would affect crowdwork. In particular, motivated by the concept of peer instruction in educational settings, we study the effects of peer communication in crowdsourcing environments. In the crowdsourcing setting with peer communication, pairs of workers are asked to complete the same task together by first generating their initial answers to the task independently and then freely discussing the tasks with each other and updating their answers after the discussion. We experimentally examine the effects of peer…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing · Expert finding and Q&A systems · Auction Theory and Applications
