Comparing Two Approaches in Heteroscedastic Regression Models
Ali Akbar Jafari

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that two recent methods for testing coefficient equality in heteroscedastic regression models are statistically equivalent, unifying their theoretical foundations and extending the result to one-way ANOVA.
Contribution
It proves the equivalence of the generalized test and fiducial approaches, clarifying their relationship and applicability in heteroscedastic regression and ANOVA.
Findings
The two approaches are statistically identical in distribution.
The equivalence holds for one-way ANOVA.
This unification simplifies the choice of testing methods.
Abstract
Recently, a generalized test approach is proposed by Sadooghi-alvandi et al. (2016) and a fiducial approach is proposed by Xu and Li (2018) to test the equality of coefficients in several regression models with unequal variances. In this paper, it is shown that the considered quantities in these approaches are identically distributed and therefore, these approaches are same. Also, this result satisfies for the one-way ANOVA problem.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
