Mass - metallicity relation and fundamental metallicity relation of metal-poor star-forming galaxies at $0.6<z<0.9$ from the eBOSS survey
Yulong Gao (USTC), Min Bao (NNU), Qirong Yuan (NNU), Xu Kong (USTC),, Hu Zou (NAOC), Xu Zhou (NAOC), Yizhou Gu (NNU), Zesen Lin (USTC), Zhixiong, Liang (USTC), and Chi Huang (USTC)

TL;DR
This study investigates the mass-metallicity and fundamental metallicity relations of metal-poor star-forming galaxies at redshifts 0.6 to 0.9, revealing deviations from local universe relations due to higher star formation rates and cosmic evolution.
Contribution
First to identify and analyze extremely metal-poor star-forming galaxies at intermediate redshifts using auroral emission lines from eBOSS data, highlighting evolution of MZR and FMR.
Findings
Identified nine extremely metal-poor galaxies with 12+log(O/H) ≤ 7.69
Metal-poor galaxies exhibit over ten times higher SFRs at fixed stellar mass
Confirmed evolution of MZR and FMR with redshift and higher SFRs in metal-poor galaxies
Abstract
The stellar mass-metallicity relation (, MZR) indicates that the metallicities of galaxies increase with increasing stellar masses. The fundamental metallicity relation (FMR) suggests that the galaxies with higher star formation rates (SFRs) tend to have lower metallicities for a given stellar mass. To examine whether the MZR and FMR still hold at poorer metallicities and higher redshifts, we compile a sample of 35 star-forming galaxies (SFGs) at using the public spectral database () of emission-line galaxies from the extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS). These galaxies are identified for their significant auroral emission line (). With the electronic temperature metallicity calibration, we find nine SFGs are extremely metal-poor galaxies with .…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
