Quantifying the Burden of Exploration and the Unfairness of Free Riding
Christopher Jung, Sampath Kannan, Neil Lutz

TL;DR
This paper investigates how multiple decision makers in multi-armed bandit problems can exploit each other's actions to achieve low regret, revealing conditions under which free riding is highly effective in both stochastic and linear contextual settings.
Contribution
It introduces a formal analysis of free riding in multi-agent bandit scenarios, demonstrating that observing other agents' actions can drastically reduce regret under standard assumptions.
Findings
Free riders can achieve $O(1)$ regret by observing self-reliant agents.
Conditions for low regret include arms being pulled logarithmically often and agents using zero-regret algorithms.
In linear contextual bandits, free riders succeed when their context is a small combination of others' contexts.
Abstract
We consider the multi-armed bandit setting with a twist. Rather than having just one decision maker deciding which arm to pull in each round, we have different decision makers (agents). In the simple stochastic setting, we show that a "free-riding" agent observing another "self-reliant" agent can achieve just regret, as opposed to the regret lower bound of when one decision maker is playing in isolation. This result holds whenever the self-reliant agent's strategy satisfies either one of two assumptions: (1) each arm is pulled at least times in expectation for a constant that we compute, or (2) the self-reliant agent achieves realized regret with high probability. Both of these assumptions are satisfied by standard zero-regret algorithms. Under the second assumption, we further show that the free rider only needs to observe the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
