Suppression of intrinsic neutron background in the Multi-Grid detector
E. Dian (1, 2, 3), K. Kanaki (2), A. Khaplanov (2), T. Kittelmann, (2), P. Zagyvai (1, 3), R. Hall-Wilton (2, 4), ((1) Hungarian Academy, of Sciences, Centre for Energy Research, Budapest, Hungary, (2) European, Spallation Source ESS ERIC, Lund, Sweden

TL;DR
This paper investigates how to reduce the intrinsic neutron background in the Multi-Grid detector at ESS using Monte Carlo simulations, aiming to improve the Signal-to-Background ratio for neutron scattering instruments.
Contribution
It provides a detailed simulation-based analysis of intrinsic background sources and evaluates shielding strategies for the Multi-Grid detector at ESS.
Findings
Optimal internal shielding configurations identified.
Shielding materials like B4C and Cd improve background suppression.
Recommendations for combined shielding design to enhance SBR.
Abstract
One of the key requirements for neutron scattering instruments is the Signal-to-Background ratio (SBR). This is as well a design driving requirement for many instruments at the European Spallation Source (ESS), which aspires to be the brightest neutron source of the world. The SBR can be effectively improved with background reduction. The Multi-Grid, a large-area thermal neutron detector with a solid boron carbide converter, is a novel solution for chopper spectrometers. This detector will be installed for the three prospective chopper spectrometers at the ESS. As the Multi-Grid detector is a large area detector with a complex structure, its intrinsic background and its suppression via advanced shielding design should be investigated in its complexity, as it cannot be naively calculated. The intrinsic scattered neutron background and its effect on the SBR is determined via a detailed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
