The role of the asymmetric Ekman dissipation term on the energetics of the two-layer quasi-geostrophic model
Eleftherios Gkioulekas

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how asymmetric Ekman dissipation affects energy and enstrophy in a two-layer quasi-geostrophic model, revealing scale-dependent dissipation and potential energy injection at small scales.
Contribution
It provides theoretical insights into the effects of standard and extrapolated Ekman terms on energetics and enstrophy distribution in the model.
Findings
Ekman term dissipates energy at large scales
Ekman term does not dissipate potential enstrophy at large scales
At small scales, the extrapolated Ekman term can inject energy or enstrophy
Abstract
In the two-layer quasi-geostrophic model, the friction between the flow at the lower layer and the surface boundary layer, placed beneath the lower layer, is modeled by the Ekman term, which is a linear dissipation term with respect to the horizontal velocity at the lower layer. The Ekman term appears in the governing equations asymmetrically; it is placed at the lower layer, but does not appear at the upper layer. A variation, proposed by Phillips and Salmon, uses extrapolation to place the Ekman term between the lower layer and the surface boundary layer, or at the surface boundary layer. We present theoretical results that show that in either the standard or the extrapolated configurations, the Ekman term dissipates energy at large scales, but does not dissipate potential enstrophy. It also creates an approximately symmetric stable distribution of potential enstrophy between the two…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
