Putting the hadron beam scenario for extreme blazars to the test with the Cherenkov Telescope Array
F. Tavecchio, P. Romano, M. Landoni, S. Vercellone

TL;DR
This study evaluates the Cherenkov Telescope Array's ability to distinguish between hadron beam and standard models for extreme BL Lac objects by simulating high-energy gamma-ray spectra, focusing on the detection of a predicted 100 TeV tail.
Contribution
The paper provides the first detailed simulation-based assessment of CTA's capability to test the hadron beam scenario in extreme BL Lacs through high-energy gamma-ray observations.
Findings
CTA can detect gamma-ray emission up to 100 TeV if the hadron beam model is correct.
CTA observations can differentiate between the hadron beam and standard models based on high-energy spectral features.
Detection or non-detection above 10 TeV can confirm or rule out the hadron beam scenario.
Abstract
Hadron beams are invoked to explain the peculiar properties of a subclass of BL Lac objects, the so-called extreme BL Lacs (EHBLs). This scenario predicts a quite distinctive feature for the high-energy gamma-ray spectrum of these sources, namely a hard energy tail extending up to TeV. It has been proposed that the detection of this tail can offer an unambiguous way to distinguish between the hadron beam scenario and the standard one, which instead assumes gamma-ray emission from the jet strongly depleted at the highest energies ( TeV) because of the interaction with the optical-IR cosmic radiation field. We present dedicated simulations of observations through the presently under construction Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) of the very-high energy spectrum of the prototypical EHBL 1ES 0229+200 assuming the two alternative models. We demonstrate that, considering 50…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
