Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags
Robin Haunschild, Loet Leydesdorff, Lutz Bornmann, Iina Hellsten, and, Werner Marx

TL;DR
This study compares author keywords and hashtags on Twitter to determine if public discussions on climate change focus on different topics than scientific research, revealing that public interest centers on climate impacts and solutions.
Contribution
It introduces a network approach analyzing Twitter data to distinguish public discussion topics from research topics in climate change literature.
Findings
Twitter users focus on climate change impacts and solutions.
Public discussions differ from research focus, emphasizing effects and adaptation.
Scientific jargon is less likely to be tweeted.
Abstract
Twitter accounts have already been used in many scientometric studies, but the meaningfulness of the data for societal impact measurements in research evaluation has been questioned. Earlier research focused on social media counts and neglected the interactive nature of the data. We explore a new network approach based on Twitter data in which we compare author keywords to hashtags as indicators of topics. We analyze the topics of tweeted publications and compare them with the topics of all publications (tweeted and not tweeted). Our exploratory study is based on a comprehensive publication set of climate change research. We are interested in whether Twitter data are able to reveal topics of public discussions which can be separated from research-focused topics. We find that the most tweeted topics regarding climate change research focus on the consequences of climate change for humans.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
