KROSS-SAMI: A Direct IFS Comparison of the Tully-Fisher Relation Across 8 Gyr Since $z \approx 1$
A. L. Tiley (1,2), M. Bureau (2), L. Cortese (3,4), C. M. Harrison, (5,1), H. L. Johnson (1), J. P. Stott (6), A. M. Swinbank (1), I. Smail (1),, D. Sobral (6), A. J. Bunker (2,7), K. Glazebrook (8), R. G. Bower (9,1), D., Obreschkow (3), J. J. Bryant (10,11,4), M. J. Jarvis (2

TL;DR
This study compares the Tully-Fisher relations of galaxies at redshifts around 1 and 0 using direct IFS data, revealing that when data quality is matched, the relations are consistent over 8 billion years for star-forming disk galaxies.
Contribution
It provides a direct, bias-controlled comparison of Tully-Fisher relations across 8 Gyr, highlighting the importance of data quality matching in such analyses.
Findings
No significant zero-point evolution in TFR for star-forming disks over 8 Gyr.
Differences in TFR slopes and scatter are driven by data quality effects.
Matching data quality reveals consistent galaxy growth mechanisms across epochs.
Abstract
We construct Tully-Fisher relations (TFRs), from large samples of galaxies with spatially-resolved H emission maps from the K-band Multi-Object Spectrograph (KMOS) Redshift One Spectroscopic Survey (KROSS) at . We compare these to data from the Sydney-Australian-Astronomical-Observatory Multi-object Integral-Field Spectrograph (SAMI) Galaxy Survey at . We stringently match the data quality of the latter to the former, and apply identical analysis methods and sub-sample selection criteria to both to conduct a direct comparison of the absolute -band magnitude and stellar mass TFRs at and . We find that matching the quality of the SAMI data to that of KROSS results in TFRs that differ significantly in slope, zero-point and (sometimes) scatter in comparison to the corresponding original SAMI relations. These differences are in every…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
