
TL;DR
This paper reviews various realist interpretations of the wave function in quantum mechanics, aiming to clarify its physical meaning and implications for understanding quantum reality.
Contribution
It categorizes and compares three main realist interpretations of the wave function within non-relativistic quantum mechanics.
Findings
Ontological, nomological, and sui generis interpretations analyzed
Comparison clarifies differences and similarities among interpretations
Enhances understanding of quantum realism and the wave function's role
Abstract
A century after the discovery of quantum mechanics, the meaning of quantum mechanics still remains elusive. This is largely due to the puzzling nature of the wave function, the central object in quantum mechanics. If we are realists about quantum mechanics, how should we understand the wave function? What does it represent? What is its physical meaning? Answering these questions would improve our understanding of what it means to be a realist about quantum mechanics. In this survey article, I review and compare several realist interpretations of the wave function. They fall into three categories: ontological interpretations, nomological interpretations, and the \emph{sui generis} interpretation. For simplicity, I will focus on non-relativistic quantum mechanics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
