Simulating the M-R Relation from APF follow up of TESS targets: Survey design and strategies for overcoming mass biases
Jennifer Burt, Bradford P. Holden, Angie Wolfgang, L. G. Bouma

TL;DR
This study uses simulations of RV follow-up campaigns for TESS exoplanets to analyze biases in mass measurements, proposing strategies to improve the accuracy of the mass-radius relation and optimize observational schemes.
Contribution
It introduces simulation-based analysis of RV follow-up strategies, highlighting how sampling schemes affect mass measurement biases and detection significance.
Findings
Masses below 10 M⊕ tend to be overestimated regardless of scheme.
Including all measurements reduces mass bias significantly.
Uniform sampling schemes yield more significant mass detections.
Abstract
We present simulations of multi-year RV follow up campaigns of the {\it TESS} small exoplanet yield on the Automated Planet Finder telescope, using four different schemes to sample the transiting planets' RV phase curves. For planets below roughly 10 M we see a systematic bias of measured masses that are higher than the true planet mass, regardless of the observing scheme used. This produces a statistically significant difference in the mass-radius relation we recover, where planet masses are predicted to be too high and too similar across the entire super-Earth to Neptune radius range. This bias is due in part to only reporting masses that are measured with high statistical significance. Incorporating all mass measurements, even those that are essentially only upper limits, significantly mitigates this bias. We also find statistically significant differences between the mean…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
