Factorized Machine Self-Confidence for Decision-Making Agents
Brett W Israelsen, Nisar R Ahmed, Eric Frew, Dale Lawrence, Brian, Argrow

TL;DR
This paper introduces a factorized framework for autonomous systems to assess their own decision-making confidence, focusing on solver quality within Markov decision processes, to improve trust and reliability.
Contribution
It presents a novel factorization-based approach to quantify machine self-confidence, specifically defining and assessing solver quality in Markov decision processes.
Findings
The solver quality metric behaves as expected across various conditions.
Numerical experiments demonstrate the metric's effectiveness in autonomous navigation.
The approach offers a foundation for future algorithmic assurances in autonomous systems.
Abstract
Algorithmic assurances from advanced autonomous systems assist human users in understanding, trusting, and using such systems appropriately. Designing these systems with the capacity of assessing their own capabilities is one approach to creating an algorithmic assurance. The idea of `machine self-confidence' is introduced for autonomous systems. Using a factorization based framework for self-confidence assessment, one component of self-confidence, called `solver-quality', is discussed in the context of Markov decision processes for autonomous systems. Markov decision processes underlie much of the theory of reinforcement learning, and are commonly used for planning and decision making under uncertainty in robotics and autonomous systems. A `solver quality' metric is formally defined in the context of decision making algorithms based on Markov decision processes. A method for assessing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAI-based Problem Solving and Planning · Reinforcement Learning in Robotics · Artificial Intelligence in Games
