Weak-Identification Robust Wild Bootstrap applied to a Consistent Model Specification Test
Jonathan B. Hill

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new wild bootstrap method for robustly testing models with nuisance parameters and weak identification, ensuring valid p-values and improved test performance.
Contribution
It develops a robust bootstrap approach that handles various identification issues without requiring covariance knowledge, and introduces smoothed p-value tests for consistency and size control.
Findings
The proposed method is robust across different identification scenarios.
Smoothed p-value tests outperform traditional methods in size and power.
Simulation results show improved empirical size and power over existing tests.
Abstract
We present a new robust bootstrap method for a test when there is a nuisance parameter under the alternative, and some parameters are possibly weakly or non-identified. We focus on a Bierens (1990)-type conditional moment test of omitted nonlinearity for convenience, and because of difficulties that have been ignored to date. Existing methods include the supremum p-value which promotes a conservative test that is generally not consistent, and test statistic transforms like the supremum and average for which bootstrap methods are not valid under weak identification. We propose a new wild bootstrap method for p-value computation by targeting specific identification cases. We then combine bootstrapped p-values across polar identification cases to form an asymptotically valid p-value approximation that is robust to any identification case. The wild bootstrap does not require knowledge of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
