KIC 2568888: To be or not to be a binary
N. Theme{\ss}l, S. Hekker, A. Mints, R. A. Garc\'ia, A. Garc\'ia, Saravia Ortiz de Montellano, P. B. Stetson, J. De Ridder

TL;DR
This study investigates whether two red giants observed by Kepler form a true binary system using asteroseismology, photometry, and Gaia data, revealing complexities that challenge the binary interpretation.
Contribution
It combines asteroseismic analysis with photometric and Gaia data to assess the binary nature of two red giants, highlighting the rarity and complexity of such systems.
Findings
Detected oscillation modes for two red giants in a single spectrum
Found similar ages and mass ratios close to 1 for the stars
Distances from Gaia and photometry are inconsistent, challenging the binary hypothesis
Abstract
In cases where both components of a binary system show oscillations, asteroseismology has been proposed as a method to identify the system. For KIC 2568888, observed with , we detect oscillation modes for two red giants in a single power density spectrum. Through an asteroseismic study we investigate if the stars have similar properties, which could be an indication that they are physically bound into a binary system. While one star lies on the red giant branch (RGB), the other, more evolved star, is either a RGB or asymptotic-giant-branch star. We found similar ages for the red giants and a mass ratio close to 1. Based on these asteroseismic results we propose KIC 2568888 as a rare candidate binary system ( chance). However, when combining the asteroseismic data with ground-based photometry we estimated different distances for the stars, which we cross-checked…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
