Review of Barriers for Federated Identity Adoption for Users and Organizations
John Sherlock, Manoj Muniswamaiah, Lauren Clarke, Shawn Cicoria

TL;DR
This paper reviews the barriers and enablers affecting the adoption of Federated Identity Management (FIM) among organizations and users, highlighting trust issues and potential for simplified authentication methods like social login.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of the acceptance levels and barriers for FIM adoption across different sectors and user groups.
Findings
FIM is widely accepted in educational, commercial, and government sectors.
Trust remains a significant barrier for general population adoption.
Social login methods could facilitate broader acceptance.
Abstract
A look at Identity as a Service (IDaaS) and Federated Identity Management (FIM) and acceptance amongst organizations, users, and general population. While FIM has shown acceptance amongst educational, commercial and government organizations, the general population acting has not seen the level of trust as the former. What are the barriers or enablers for acceptance that might allow, in the extreme example, the ability to logon to a bank with your Facebook credentials and transact business?
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection · User Authentication and Security Systems · Spam and Phishing Detection
