Bayesian Evidence Accumulation on Social Networks
Bhargav Karamched, Simon Stolarczyk, Zachary Kilpatrick and, Kre\v{s}imir Josi\'c

TL;DR
This paper develops Bayesian models of social networks where agents integrate private evidence and neighbors' decisions to make optimal, irreversible choices, revealing complex dynamics like decision cascades and the informative value of non-decisions.
Contribution
It introduces a framework connecting social decision models with evidence accumulation theories, highlighting how network structure influences decision dynamics.
Findings
Absence of decision becomes increasingly informative over time.
Single decisions can trigger cascades of agreement or disagreement.
Non-decisions provide independent information unless private evidence is redundant.
Abstract
To make decisions we are guided by the evidence we collect, as well as the opinions of friends and neighbors. How do we integrate our private beliefs with information we obtain from our social network? To understand the strategies humans use to do so it is useful to compare them to observers that optimally integrate all evidence. Here we derive network models of rational (Bayes optimal) agents who accumulate private measurements and observe decisions of their neighbors to make an irreversible choice between two options. The resulting information exchange dynamics has interesting properties: When one option is preferred, the absence of a decision can be increasingly informative over time. In recurrent networks an absence of a decision can lead to a sequence of belief updates akin to those in the literature on common knowledge. Information obtained from observing repeated non-decisions is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
