Can evolution paths be explained by chance alone?
Rinaldo B. Schinazi

TL;DR
This paper introduces a probabilistic model explaining the evolution of population maximum fitness, revealing a logarithmic number of upward jumps and path patterns consistent with experimental observations.
Contribution
It presents a universal probabilistic framework for evolution paths, demonstrating that upward fitness jumps follow a logarithmic pattern regardless of mutation probability or fitness distribution.
Findings
Number of upward jumps is approximately ln(n) after n births
Evolution paths typically show a steep rise followed by plateaux
Parallel evolution paths are observed across independent runs
Abstract
We propose a purely probabilistic model to explain the evolution path of a population maximum fitness. We show that after births in the population there are about upwards jumps. This is true for any mutation probability and any fitness distribution and therefore suggests a general law for the number of upwards jumps. Simulations of our model show that a typical evolution path has first a steep rise followed by long plateaux. Moreover, independent runs show parallel paths. This is consistent with what was observed by Lenski and Travisano (1994) in their bacteria experiments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
