Evolution of Star-forming Galaxies from z = 0.7 to 1.2 with eBOSS Emission-line Galaxies
Hong Guo, Xiaohu Yang, Anand Raichoor, Zheng Zheng, Johan Comparat, V., Gonzalez-Perez, Jean-Paul Kneib, Donald P. Schneider, Dmitry Bizyaev, Daniel, Oravetz, Audrey Oravetz, Kaike Pan

TL;DR
This study analyzes the evolution of star-forming galaxies between redshifts 0.7 and 1.2 using eBOSS emission-line galaxies, revealing weak evolution in stellar mass relations and halo occupation, with insights into galaxy bias and satellite fractions.
Contribution
It introduces an application of the incomplete conditional stellar mass function model to constrain galaxy properties and evolution over the specified redshift range.
Findings
eBOSS ELGs only sample 1-10% of star-forming galaxies at these redshifts
Weak evolution observed in stellar-halo mass relation from z=1.2 to 0.7
Satellite fraction varies from 13% to 17%, galaxy bias increases from 1.1 to 1.4
Abstract
We study the evolution of star-forming galaxies with over the redshift range of 0.7<z<1.2 using the emission line galaxies (ELGs) in the extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS). By applying the incomplete conditional stellar mass function (ICSMF) model proposed in Guo et al., we simultaneously constrain the sample completeness, the stellar--halo mass relation (SHMR) and the quenched galaxy fraction. We obtain the intrinsic stellar mass functions for star-forming galaxies in the redshift bins of 0.7<z<0.8, 0.8<z<0.9, 0.9<z<1.0 and 1.0<z<1.2, as well as the stellar mass function for all galaxies in the redshift bin of 0.7<z<0.8. We find that the eBOSS ELG sample only selects about 1%-10% of the star-forming galaxy population at the different redshifts, with the lower redshift samples to be more complete. There is only weak evolution…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
