BICEP2 / Keck Array x: Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and New BICEP2/Keck Observations through the 2015 Season
Keck Array, BICEP2 Collaborations: P. A. R. Ade (1), Z. Ahmed (2),, R. W. Aikin (3), K. D. Alexander (4), D. Barkats (4), S. J. Benton (5), C. A., Bischoff (6), J. J. Bock (3,7) R. Bowens-Rubin (4), J. A. Brevik (3), I., Buder (4), E. Bullock (8), V. Buza (4,9), J. Connors (4)

TL;DR
This paper combines BICEP2/Keck, Planck, and WMAP data to set the most stringent limits yet on primordial gravitational waves, constraining the tensor-to-scalar ratio r to less than 0.07 at 95% confidence.
Contribution
It provides new constraints on primordial gravitational waves by analyzing combined polarization data from multiple experiments up to 2015, including novel Keck Array observations at 220 GHz.
Findings
Constraint r_{0.05}<0.07 at 95% confidence
Lensing signal detected at 8.8 sigma
Foreground model adequately fits the data
Abstract
We present results from an analysis of all data taken by the BICEP2/Keck CMB polarization experiments up to and including the 2015 observing season. This includes the first Keck Array observations at 220 GHz and additional observations at 95 & 150 GHz. The maps reach depths of 5.2, 2.9 and 26 K arcmin at 95, 150 and 220 GHz respectively over an effective area of square degrees. The 220 GHz maps achieve a signal-to-noise on polarized dust emission approximately equal to that of Planck at 353 GHz. We take auto- and cross-spectra between these maps and publicly available WMAP and Planck maps at frequencies from 23 to 353 GHz. We evaluate the joint likelihood of the spectra versus a multicomponent model of lensed-CDM++dust+synchrotron+noise. The foreground model has seven parameters, and we impose priors on some of these using external…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
