On the centralizer of vector fields: criteria of triviality and genericity results
Martin Leguil, Davi Obata, Bruno Santiago

TL;DR
This paper studies the size and structure of the centralizer of vector fields on compact manifolds, providing criteria for triviality and showing that generically, the centralizer is small or trivial, especially under hyperbolicity conditions.
Contribution
It introduces new criteria for small and trivial centralizers of vector fields, including generic and hyperbolic cases, and establishes equivalences between collinearity and triviality in higher regularity.
Findings
Generic vector fields have small, collinear centralizers.
Hyperbolic singularities lead to quasi-trivial centralizers.
In higher regularity, collinearity and triviality are equivalent.
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the question of whether a typical vector field on a compact connected Riemannian manifold has a `small' centralizer. In the case, we give two criteria, one of which is -generic, which guarantees that the centralizer of a -generic vector field is indeed small, namely \textit{collinear}. The other criterion states that a \textit{separating} flow has a collinear -centralizer. When all the singularities are hyperbolic, we prove that the collinearity property can actually be promoted to a stronger one, refered as \textit{quasi-triviality}. In particular, the -centralizer of a -generic vector field is quasi-trivial. In certain cases, we obtain the triviality of the centralizer of a -generic vector field, which includes -generic Axiom A (or sectional Axiom A) vector fields and -generic vector fields with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
