Time consistency for scalar multivariate risk measures
Zachary Feinstein, Birgit Rudloff

TL;DR
This paper develops a recursive formulation for dynamic multivariate scalar risk measures, establishing a notion of 'moving scalarization' that ensures time consistency in markets with transaction costs and systemic risk.
Contribution
It introduces a new recursive relation for scalarizations of multivariate risk measures, enabling time consistency through a dynamic 'moving scalarization' approach.
Findings
Provides dual representations of multivariate scalar risk measures.
Establishes an equivalent recursive formulation for multiportfolio time consistency.
Introduces the concept of 'moving scalarization' for scalar time consistency.
Abstract
In this paper we present results on dynamic multivariate scalar risk measures, which arise in markets with transaction costs and systemic risk. Dual representations of such risk measures are presented. These are then used to obtain the main results of this paper on time consistency; namely, an equivalent recursive formulation of multivariate scalar risk measures to multiportfolio time consistency. We are motivated to study time consistency of multivariate scalar risk measures as the superhedging risk measure in markets with transaction costs (with a single eligible asset) (Jouini and Kallal (1995), Roux and Zastawniak (2016), Loehne and Rudloff (2014)) does not satisfy the usual scalar concept of time consistency. In fact, as demonstrated in (Feinstein and Rudloff (2021)), scalar risk measures with the same scalarization weight at all times would not be time consistent in general. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
