Automata for Infinite Argumentation Structures
Pietro Baroni, Federico Cerutti, Paul E. Dunne, Massimiliano Giacomin

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel formalism using automata and formal language theory to model and analyze infinite argumentation frameworks, extending the finite case to infinite structures with practical decision procedures.
Contribution
It proposes a new automata-based approach for describing infinite argumentation frameworks, enabling analysis of infinite structures with desirable properties and decision algorithms.
Findings
The approach captures a wide range of infinite afs, including key examples from literature.
Decision problems in finite afs are extended to infinite afs with polynomial-time algorithms.
The method is effective for finitary afs, providing additional theoretical insights.
Abstract
The theory of abstract argumentation frameworks (afs) has, in the main, focused on finite structures, though there are many significant contexts where argumentation can be regarded as a process involving infinite objects. To address this limitation, in this paper we propose a novel approach for describing infinite afs using tools from formal language theory. In particular, the possibly infinite set of arguments is specified through the language recognized by a deterministic finite automaton while a suitable formalism, called attack expression, is introduced to describe the relation of attack between arguments. The proposed approach is shown to satisfy some desirable properties which can not be achieved through other "naive" uses of formal languages. In particular, the approach is shown to be expressive enough to capture (besides any arbitrary finite structure) a large variety of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
